From: Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:06:14 +0200
I am sorry not to have told everyone before, but I discussed with leo
on IRC and the scheme he originally envisionned is actually very close
to NLDC and more simple : simply do the NLD pass at the same
From: Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:15:33 +0100
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:32:32PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
>For the record, is it acceptable in Parrot to use page
> write-protection to record whether oldspace objects have been modified
> since
On 7/25/05, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still digesting it (and trying to bone up on GC algorithms at the
> same time), but it does sound like it should work. I assume that
> "forall (p -> q)" above really means "forall (q0 -> q where q0 == p)",
> i.e. process all IGP entries from
Uploading it here
Index: classes/resizablepmcarray.pmc
===
--- classes/resizablepmcarray.pmc (revision 8687)
+++ classes/resizablepmcarray.pmc (working copy)
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@
PMC* clone () {
PMC *copy = SUPER();
-
+
Rather than adding another file, I'd recommend putting these under
DESIGN in docs/ROADMAP. Then they're all in one place for Chip when
he gets more tuits.
I added a link to this one there.
Regards.
On Jul 25, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Nicholas Clark wrote:
This all g
Nicholas Clark wrote:
This all got Warnocked, didn't it?
Having read it twice, I don't think I'm going to get closer to a decent
response than "er, this is really a call for the designer to make, isn't it?"
Mway be it's time to start a WARNOCKED file in parrot's root dir and
collect such und
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:32:32PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
>For the record, is it acceptable in Parrot to use page
> write-protection to record whether oldspace objects have been modified
> since the last full GC? This is what CMUCL does on most ports, but it
> occurs to me that this might b
