embedding ParTcl

2005-07-27 Thread Thilo Planz
Hi, I have a few beginner's question about ParTcl. I am trying to embed ParTcl into a PIR application, which seems to work quite nicely, except that I have not yet figured out how to do certain things. = 1) Is there a way to reset the Tcl interpreter between invocations? .sub _main @M

Re: [perl #36647] 'make languages' should continue after building a language failed

2005-07-27 Thread Jonathan Worthington
"Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jul 27, 2005, at 16:00, Jerry Gay via RT wrote: but what is all this .dummy business? that is a thing I thought too several times. Now we know, it'd probably be a Good Thing if the makefiles actually had a comment in that explained this to anyo

Re: pmc syntax

2005-07-27 Thread Will Coleda
On Jul 27, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: hi, Is there any documentation about the complete syntax for pmc files when writing PMCs (this time in C)? I think that's technically the only way to write PMCs. (things written in PIR are Objects). And, as you've seen, pmc2c.pl is cu

Re: [perl #36647] 'make languages' should continue after building a language failed

2005-07-27 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Jul 27, 2005, at 16:00, Jerry Gay via RT wrote: leo's fix (r8695) works just fine on windows :) IIRC bernhard's and ... but what is all this .dummy business? that is a thing I thought too several times. leo

pmc syntax

2005-07-27 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
hi, Is there any documentation about the complete syntax for pmc files when writing PMCs (this time in C)? I found genclass.pl and pmc2c.pl, but I couldn't find anything about all keywords that can be used. In particular, I wrote down some scenarios. Maybe there are some more cases than these

Re: [perl #36647] 'make languages' should continue after building a language failed

2005-07-27 Thread Will Coleda
I believe that .PHONY is a gnu-make ism, and for now, we at least have to support nmake, and Solaris's /usr/ccs/bin/make, etc. According to http://www.bell-labs.com/project/nmake/faq/gmake.html nmake has something similar called .VIRTUAL - someone could abstract out the makefile-specifics o

Re: [perl #36647] 'make languages' should continue after building a language failed

2005-07-27 Thread Matt Fowles
Will~ Doesn't make have something called "PHONY" to handle that exact case? Matt On 7/27/05, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is because there's a directory called "tcl". Since the directly > already exists, there'd be nothing to make. > > Picking a dummy target like this is a way

Re: [perl #36647] 'make languages' should continue after building a language failed

2005-07-27 Thread Will Coleda
This is because there's a directory called "tcl". Since the directly already exists, there'd be nothing to make. Picking a dummy target like this is a way to force the target to always be built, regardless. On Jul 27, 2005, at 10:00 AM, Jerry Gay via RT wrote: leo's fix (r8695) works just

[perl #36647] 'make languages' should continue after building a language failed

2005-07-27 Thread Jerry Gay via RT
leo's fix (r8695) works just fine on windows :) but what is all this .dummy business? tcl: tcl.dummy tcl.dummy: - $(MAKE_C) tcl tcl.test: - $(MAKE_C) tcl test tcl.clean: - $(MAKE_C) tcl clean can't that just be tcl: - $(MAKE_C) tcl etc. ~jerry