> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Di 19. Okt 2004, 19:49:44]:
> Is it the intended operation of the 'factorial' program on the Parrot
> examples page to
> truncate the results? Looks like a bug to me...
I have checked the factorial example on
http://www.parrotcode.org/examples/pasm.html.
Starting with 13!
On Sep 8, 2005, at 18:59, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Would it make sense if it returned 0 rather than -1 on "not found"?
The implementation can never return a reference count of 0, because
keys
are automatically deleted when they are decremented to 0.
Yep. Just change it.
Nicholas Clark
leo
> [jonathan - Mi 07. Sep 2005, 15:41:58]:
> >
> I see some updates to the examples, so guess somebody is having a hack
> at this task. FYI, current test status on Win32:-
Actually I haven't looked at the code at all. All I did was to add
$Id$ tags for SVN.
CU, Bernhard
--
/* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mi 07. Sep 2005, 14:29:39]:
>
> This patch adds a new test, t/docs/pod.t, that scans through the parrot
> tree and checks the Pod syntax of all files identified by Pod::Find as
> containing Pod markup. This is invoked by a new test target named
> "doc_tests" which has been a
Jonathan Worthington schrieb:
"Joshua Hoblitt (via RT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HmmmI'm thinking these lines shouldn't be there:-
+<<< .mine
+>>> .r9142
Yes, sure.
I must have missed an conflict when svn had to do some merging.
The svn litter is removed in r9158.
CU, Bernh
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:56:31PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >Following on our discussion on IRC, what I think we agreed on was that
> >Parrot should provide a new PMC class functionally similar to how the
> >dod_register_pmc/dod_unregister_pmc works. Quite probably it
"Joshua Hoblitt (via RT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@@ -95,10 +97,17 @@
=head2 PMCs
>
+<<< .mine
+PMC stands for Parrot Magic Cookie. PMCs represent any complex data
structure
+or type, including aggregate data types (arrays, hash tables, etc). A PMC
can
+implement its own behavior f
Hi,
I'll be brave and have a crack at this one. :-)
Leo and I have had some discussions about moving some packfile related
code into PMCs, which sould neaten things up and, importantly, make
packfile manipulation accessible to Parrot programs. While I know I'll
need to re-work pbc_merge to use th
>
> I have add t/examples/japh.t, which tests the JAPHs in 'examples/japh'.
> Currently 10 out of 15 JAPHs are broken at least on my Linux machine.
>
> These broken JAPHs should be fixed. Furthermore some JAPHs in PIR,
PIL, PAST
> would be nice.
>
I see some updates to the examples, so guess som
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
# Please include the string: [perl #37100]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37100 >
This patch adds a new test, t/docs/pod.t, that scans through the parrot
tree and chec
10 matches
Mail list logo