merge release

2005-09-28 Thread Leopold Toetsch
1) I'll start merging branches/leo-ctx5 back to trunk soon. - The merge isn't a merge, but a switch - Please refrain from svn checkins until this is finished - I'll send another note, when it's done 2) Thereafter the trunk remains feature-frozen - no new feature checkins please - bugfixes and

Re: merge release

2005-09-28 Thread Roger Browne
Leopold Toetsch wrote: 3) Release will follow at the weekend It's none of my business I know, but why not give the release a more realistic number (e.g. 0.7.0)? People tend to extrapolate that if it took 5 years to get to 0.2.3 then it will take another 16 years to get to version 1.0. Regards,

Re: [perl #17490] Magic is useless unless verifiable.

2005-09-28 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:49:52PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:29:52PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: An updated patch is attached. All OK now with me, thanks. The ASCII art of the 'padding' was wrong. A corrected patch is attached. -J -- Index:

Re: merge release

2005-09-28 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Roger Browne wrote: Leopold Toetsch wrote: 3) Release will follow at the weekend It's none of my business I know, but why not give the release a more realistic number (e.g. 0.7.0)? People tend to extrapolate that if it took 5 years to get to 0.2.3 then it will take another 16 years to get

Re: merge release

2005-09-28 Thread Robert Spier
We've actually done a merge. It is complete. All committed changes on the leo-ctx5 branch are now on trunk as of rev 9260. The leo-ctx5 branch was deleted as rev 9261. If you have any checkouts of the leo-ctx5 branch, you will need to switch them to trunk cd

Re: merge release

2005-09-28 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Sep 28, 2005, at 10:50, Leopold Toetsch wrote: 1) I'll start merging branches/leo-ctx5 back to trunk soon. - The merge isn't a merge, but a switch - Please refrain from svn checkins until this is finished Step 1) finished. All the merits and thanks belong to Robrt and clkao. Robert did

[perl #34258] [TODO] Here documents for PIR

2005-09-28 Thread Will Coleda via RT
Leo's proposed syntax is fine with me. [leo - Fri Feb 25 01:34:24 2005]: Bernhard Schmalhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, in the near, or far, future there will be test scripts and compiler input in PIR. For that it would be nice, if long text doesn't have to be crammed into a

Relaxing parrot dependency on parrot_config

2005-09-28 Thread Nick Glencross
Guys, I've been wanting to relax the dependency that parrot's core has on parrot_config. As things stand at the moment, src/global_setup.c makes a call to parrot_get_config which is linked into the executable itself by selecting either null_config.o, parrot_config.o or install_config.o. This