It's me again. Linked with gdbm (compiled with fink) and got these errors.
They are kind weird because they complain about not being able to load
the library, but the tests run correctly. If they run correctly without
loading the library one of two things happens:
1) the tests do not test the
Hi,
A while back I posted an RFC about changing the PASM/PIR debug segment so it
would be able to give useful info about PBCs produced from multiple files.
Today I've done a couple of ci's that have put this change into effect, with
the small change to the original plan that filenames are not
"Alberto Simões" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
config/gen/platform/darwin/memalign.c: In function 'Parrot_memalign':
config/gen/platform/darwin/memalign.c:58: warning: initialization makes
integer from pointer without a cast
perl -MFile::Copy=cp -e 'cp q|jit/ppc/jit_emit.h|,
q|include/parrot
[...]
config/gen/platform/darwin/memalign.c: In function 'Parrot_memalign':
config/gen/platform/darwin/memalign.c:58: warning: initialization makes
integer from pointer without a cast
perl -MFile::Copy=cp -e 'cp q|jit/ppc/jit_emit.h|,
q|include/parrot/jit_emit.h|'
src/jit.c
perl build_tools/jit
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
"Alberto Simões" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
W0rks, W0rks :)
I'll take your word for it. :-)
Well, it passes the tests :)
Cheers,
Alberto
--
Alberto Simões - Departamento de Informática - Universidade do Minho
Campus de Gualtar - 4710-057 Braga -
W0rks, W0rks :)
Somebody please apply it? :)
Cheers
Alberto
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
"Alberto Simões" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#7 0x000400b8 in scan_paths (filename=0xfcc888
"/Users/ambs/tmp/parrot/runtime/parrot/dynext/libnci_test.bundle",
libpath=0xb8a8 ":") at config/gen/platfor
Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> According to our records, your request regarding
> "[BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 t/pmc/io.t assert core dump"
> has been resolved.
According to my records, it's a TODO test and therefore not quite
yet resolved :-)
> If you have any further questions or concerns, please r
> [nickg - Mon Oct 10 12:11:00 2005]:
>
> Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
>
> >>>As a general comment, 36119 makes me a little nervous as 'chmod' isn't
> >>>something you can count on unless your on a POSIX like system and
osname
> >>>ne 'MSWin32' certainly would encompass non-POSIX systems. Are yo
"Alberto Simões" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
W0rks, W0rks :)
I'll take your word for it. :-)
Somebody please apply it? :)
Applied (r9486).
Thanks for bug hunting (and a great YAPC::EU),
Jonathan
