[perl #37487] [NEW] circle.pir

# New Ticket Created by Nick Glencross # Please include the string: [perl #37487] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37487 > I've converted circle.pasm from a really old posting (http://www.nntp.perl.org/group

Re: [perl #37481] [PATCH] Better osname for cygwin

On 10/19/05, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mi 19. Okt 2005, 08:05:56]: > > > Configure picks up the osname of a cygwin system as 'thread' which > > isn't very helpful (see the smoke screen). This patch does something > > similar to other platforms an

Re: [perl #37483] [PATCH] Pass pcre tests on cygwin

Strange... I could have sworn I attached the patch. Here it is. Nick Index: runtime/parrot/library/pcre.imc === --- runtime/parrot/library/pcre.imc (revision 9513) +++ runtime/parrot/library/pcre.imc (working copy) @@ -52,6 +5

Re: [perl #37479] [PATCH] Fix for mmap issue on HP-UX

On Oct 19, 2005, at 12:49, Nick Glencross (via RT) wrote: # New Ticket Created by Nick Glencross # Please include the string: [perl #37479] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37479 > Guys, This patch fixes a

Re: [PROPOSED PATCH] Generate src/extend.c

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:30:35AM -0700, chromatic wrote: > Hi there, > > Here's a proposed patch (for review, not application) to generate > src/extend.c from vtable.tbl. It has some limitations: Problem is that src/extend.c has some functions that aren't vtable methods. I think the better sol

Re: [perl #37483] [PATCH] Pass pcre tests on cygwin

Nick Glencross (via RT) wrote: More low hanging fruit. This patch provides pcre.imc with the correct DLL name for libpcre, enabling the pcre.t tests to pass. Note: This patch has #37481 as a prerequisite to provide the correct osname. I'm pretty sure that I attached the patch, but anyway, he

[perl #37481] [PATCH] Better osname for cygwin

# New Ticket Created by Nick Glencross # Please include the string: [perl #37481] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37481 > Rather low hanging fruit this one. Configure picks up the osname of a cygwin system

[perl #37483] [PATCH] Pass pcre tests on cygwin

# New Ticket Created by Nick Glencross # Please include the string: [perl #37483] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37483 > More low hanging fruit. This patch provides pcre.imc with the correct DLL name for l

[perl #37479] [PATCH] Fix for mmap issue on HP-UX

# New Ticket Created by Nick Glencross # Please include the string: [perl #37479] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37479 > Guys, This patch fixes a problem caused by a difference in the behaviour of mmap on

[perl #37477] [PATCH] Configure - improved lex & yacc probing

# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt # Please include the string: [perl #37477] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37477 > This transaction appears to have no contentThis patch splits the probes for lex & yac

Variable-sized reg frames 7 - r9513 and possible JIT breakage

I've started now the final changes to switch to variable-sized register frames. And while I've said that no JIT code will break, this is only true for correct and well-behaved JIT code. About a year ago the base-pointer (interpreter->ctx.bp) for register addressing was introduced and src/jit.c

Re: [perl #37458] [PATCH] add check_progs() to Parrot::Configure::Step

On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:02:51AM -0700, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote: > Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > > > Any objections to this? > > Nope. Just ci. Applied as r9512. -J -- pgpE5ndgoD93E.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [perl #37458] [PATCH] add check_progs() to Parrot::Configure::Step

Joshua Hoblitt wrote: Any objections to this? Nope. Just ci. leo

Re: Paper Software Architecture 1: started writing

Hi, first of all, thanks for reading! :-) Most things I wrote so far, I got from several sources, like the Parrot FAQ. Joshua Hoblitt wrote: This is because Parrot is implemented in C, while developing a large program such as this could well have been done in C++. This is for three r