Leopold Toetsch wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 22:22, Nick Glencross wrote:
Guys,
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a
way of providing NCI functionality.
http://www.haible.de/bruno/packages-ffcall.html
I've downloaded it and had a short look into sources. T
Nick Glencross wrote:
Nick Glencross wrote:
Guys,
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a
way of providing NCI functionality.
I seem to be seeing rather strange, and it's probably a
misunderstanding on my part.
Ok, I see what the problem is. PMC_data(x) is a
Nick Glencross wrote:
Guys,
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a
way of providing NCI functionality.
I seem to be seeing rather strange, and it's probably a misunderstanding
on my part.
I've pinched the GET_NCI_x(n) macros and accompanying get_nci_x
functio
On Oct 28, 2005, at 22:22, Nick Glencross wrote:
Guys,
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a
way of providing NCI functionality.
http://www.haible.de/bruno/packages-ffcall.html
I've downloaded it and had a short look into sources. The list of
supported plat
Guys,
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a way
of providing NCI functionality.
http://www.haible.de/bruno/packages-ffcall.html
I actually really like the current NCI implementation, although it
suffers from a large nci.c file and all the usable prototypes need
On 10/27/05, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 10:26 -0700, jerry gay wrote:
>
> > we're missing some parts of a testing framework. we don't have the
> > ability to write test files in PIR, so we're dependent on a perl
> > install for testing. perl's a great language for
Hi,
This patch fixes 'make clean' for me.
Stig
--- config/gen/makefiles/languages.in (revision 9610)
+++ config/gen/makefiles/languages.in (patch - level 1)
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
${make_set_make}
PERL = ${perl}
MAKE_C= ${make_c}
+RM_F = ${rm_f}
+
# add new languages here
# remove o
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 04:56:57PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >How do I get an anonymous coroutine into a register?
>
> As these 2 .subs are generated in one bunch and compiled ...
>
> >.sub _pge_rule
> >.param pmc mob
>
> ... drop the var decl:
>
> >.local pmc corou
>
On Thursday 27 October 2005 09:37 pm, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 11:22:40PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > On Oct 27, 2005, at 22:31, Nick Glencross wrote:
> > >There are a few cases of -1 being assigned to unsigneds. Anyone know
> > >if that's deliberate?
> >
> > Yup. Some
