i've checked in a subset of Perl 5.9.2's regexp tests for PGE to chew
on. for now, i modified the stolen harness to emit PIR. the harness is
currently very ugly... that won't be for long, however, as i'll
refactor it soon.
currently, only 130 of 960 tests are running, as the PIR-producing
harness
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-11-14 through 2005-11-21
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary. The attentive among you may notice
that this one is on time. I am not sure how that happened, but we will
try and keep it up. On a complete side note, I think there should be a
Perl guild o
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 05:26:05PM -0800, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
> My understanding is that the best attack on SHA-1 which can find two
> plaintexts with the same hash value in 2^63 operations.
> [...]
> Basically, SHA-1 isn't a problem for us yet, but it's looking weak.
OK. Thanks for q
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:51:49AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2005, at 22:09, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
>
> >I've like to nominate Jerry for an entry in RESPONSIBLE_PARTIES as the
> >test suite maintainer. Thanks for all your work Jerry.
> >
> >Any objections?
>
> Not at all - mor
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:53:53AM +, Michael Lacey wrote:
> "RESPONSIBLE" - is that like "BLAMEABLE"? *smile*
> Mike
Perhaps a better name for the file would be ENTITIES_AT_FAULT. ;)
-J
--
pgpwCKmL8dzfc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 21:05 +0100, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> Setting the Perl5 search path can be handled with FindBin. See for
> example languages/m4/t/basic/001_comletely_empty.t:
>
> use FindBin;
> use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../../lib", "$FindBin::Bin/../../../../lib";
That's fairly ugly
On 11/20/05, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for now, i've reorganized the pge tests, moving them into the
> t/compilers/pge/ directory and subdirs, in revision 10112. smoke tests
> and bug reports are welcome for all platforms. in testing, i've come
> across that may affect msvc6 on win32 (
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:30:38AM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> [*] an inode may have as few as zero or as many as USHORT_MAX[**] names,
> and finding them all requires scanning a disks's entire directory tree
Although one should note that you can loose valid names off the top of your
dire
"RESPONSIBLE" - is that like "BLAMEABLE"? *smile*
Mike
On 21/11/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2005, at 22:09, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
>
> > I've like to nominate Jerry for an entry in RESPONSIBLE_PARTIES as the
> > test suite maintainer. Thanks for all your work
On Nov 20, 2005, at 22:09, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
I've like to nominate Jerry for an entry in RESPONSIBLE_PARTIES as the
test suite maintainer. Thanks for all your work Jerry.
Any objections?
Not at all - more the opposite ;-)
-J
leo
10 matches
Mail list logo
