On Feb 3, 2006, at 12:38, Nicholas Clark wrote:
This'll likely be out-of-date tomorrow, but I found it useful as a
quick snapshot/overview of the Parrot repository.
The process used to created it isn't amenable to automation into a
cron job?
It's just a Perl script, so yeah, could be done
On Feb 4, 2006, at 16:51, Joshua Isom via RT wrote:
41 callmethodcc P1, "dump" -
P1=Object(PAST::Node)=PMC(0x50ba68),
102 get_params PMC_C[29] (2), P0, I0 - , P0=PMCNULL,
I0=5289976
106 repeat S0, "", I0- , , I0=5289976
110 add I0, 1- I0=5289976,
I sent a patch into rt, #38405, to address the make archclean issues,
so people could try it out. I'd only tested it on freebsd and darwin
and my main concern was with win32. It does a lot of restructuring to
help make it easier, and I wasn't sure how it'd be with windows.
On Feb 4, 2006, at
# New Ticket Created by Jonathan Worthington
# Please include the string: [perl #38432]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38432 >
Hi,
Here's an example of what I'm pretty sure is a bug.
.sub main :main
newcl
On Feb 5, 2006, at 0:37, Nick Glencross wrote:
Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
Compiling a static Parrot simplifies debugging, e.g. for setting
breakpoints. But it doesn't play nicely with dynamic extensions.
I'm pretty certain that after a fresh build things works perfectly,
but my hunch
On Feb 4, 2006, at 22:04, Bob Rogers wrote:
[detailed plan]
Sound good? Unless I've missed something, this seems like a win
across the board . . .
Sounds very good.
-- Bob Rogers
leo
Well, here's the xxd dump's head.
[languages/punie/t] jisom% xxd past_node_5.out | head
000: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
010: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
020: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
030: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
040: 2020
On Feb 4, 2006, at 14:23, Joshua Isom via RT wrote:
Apparently I have a 267 megabyte past_node_5.out file... And if
past_op_2.pir and past_val_2.pir were printed to a file, I imagine
it'd
do the same(printing a lot of spaces). Seems to be more than just
Parrot::Test for me.
Could you send
Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #38429]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38429 >
Platform x86/linux
Compiling a static Parrot sim
Apparently I have a 267 megabyte past_node_5.out file... And if
past_op_2.pir and past_val_2.pir were printed to a file, I imagine it'd
do the same(printing a lot of spaces). Seems to be more than just
Parrot::Test for me.
On Feb 4, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
On Feb 3, 2006,
On Feb 4, 2006, at 12:26, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
Both on OS/X darwin and x86/linux 'make test' as well as
./parrot -p languages/punie/punie.pbc languages/punie/t/
problematic_1.p1
are succeeding here.
The error is gone here too now. Not sure if it's Leo's fix or unrelated.
Allison
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:49:00 +0100
Bob Rogers wrote:
>Worse, the closed-over frame is leaked entirely. (Is this what the
> "obviously leaks memory" comment in src/register.c is talking about, or
> are there other cases of leakage
On Feb 4, 2006, at 0:47, Allison Randal wrote:
It's only in my local svk repository. I'll push it so others can work
on the bug (and try it out on multiple platforms). I temporarily added
a test file language/punie/t/problematic.t that isolates the failing
test (makes it easier to filter thro
On Feb 4, 2006, at 8:09, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
Like others, problematic.t seems to runs okay on my system
(Linux x86_64). :-( Maybe I can get access to a platform on
which it fails...?
Long ago we had an OS X box available to developers. Is that still
around? If not, I can tempo
On Feb 3, 2006, at 17:33, Joshua Isom via RT wrote:
But, I've encountered two major problems. On darwin, I can't finish
past_node.t, first parrot takes over 100 megs of ram, then perl(5.8.7)
wants 180 megs. On freebsd, it's actually worse, but more confusing.
It fails with past_*.t and post_*.
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #38429]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38429 >
Platform x86/linux
Compiling a static Parrot simplifies debugging, e.g. for setting
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 03:47:11PM -0800, Allison Randal wrote:
>
> It's only in my local svk repository. I'll push it so others can work
> on the bug (and try it out on multiple platforms). I temporarily
> added a test file language/punie/t/problematic.t that isolates the
> failing test (ma
17 matches
Mail list logo
