Re: [PATCH] My first patch, for builtins.*

2006-04-06 Thread Andy Lester
On Apr 6, 2006, at 10:52 PM, Sean Sieger wrote: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: For various annoying reasons, I can't do it, but running CPD over the code could reveal a lot of interesting information: Done. May I submit the duplications a dupe at a time? How many are there? I thi

Re: [PATCH] My first patch, for builtins.*

2006-04-06 Thread Sean Sieger
chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For various annoying reasons, I can't do it, but running CPD over the code > could reveal a lot of interesting information: Done. May I submit the duplications a dupe at a time?

[perl #38850] [BUG] Getopt/Obj.pir dies on non-existent options

2006-04-06 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Allison Randal (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:52:49 -0700 # New Ticket Created by Allison Randal # Please include the string: [perl #38850] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Disp

installing svn parrot

2006-04-06 Thread Sean Sieger
Is parrot broken? I am getting an error that reads, config.fpmc is truncated.

Re: [perl #32642] [TODO] Remove Perl* PMCs from parrot's basic PMCs, src and languages

2006-04-06 Thread Will Coleda
On Apr 6, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 02:04:06PM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote: Hi, as far as I see, the Perl* PMCs are no longer used in the Parrot core. Thanks, Bernhard. There is still some usage in unmaintained language implement

Re: [perl #32642] [TODO] Remove Perl* PMCs from parrot's basic PMCs, src and languages

2006-04-06 Thread chromatic
On Thursday 06 April 2006 14:04, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote: > 'punie' seems to be the only maintained language implementation using > Perl* PMCs. What about Ponie? > Also some tests and examples are using the Perl* PMCs. I agree that they probably shouldn't, except for the tests for th

Re: [perl #32642] [TODO] Remove Perl* PMCs from parrot's basic PMCs, src and languages

2006-04-06 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 02:04:06PM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote: > Hi, > > as far as I see, the Perl* PMCs are no longer used in the Parrot core. > > There is still some usage in unmaintained language implementations: > > BASIC/compiler unmaintained ? > BASIC/interpreter unma

Re: [perl #32507] [TODO] ResizableIntegerArray missing vtables (e.g., pop)

2006-04-06 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:46:09PM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote: > As PGE nowadays happily works with Parrot standard PMCs, I assume that > this old issue has been taken care of. Actually, this particular todo item didn't have anything to do with PGE. Leo and I were conversing about

[perl #32642] [TODO] Remove Perl* PMCs from parrot's basic PMCs, src and languages

2006-04-06 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT
Hi, as far as I see, the Perl* PMCs are no longer used in the Parrot core. There is still some usage in unmaintained language implementations: BASIC/compiler unmaintained ? BASIC/interpreter unmaintained ? forth unmaintained ? miniperlunmaintained ? parakeet