I've written up some stuff about why consting is good. It's in the
Parrot repository as cage/consting.pod.
To my old p5p homies: I send this to you so you don't forget about
consting while I'm working over here in Parrotland!
xoxo,
Andy
=head1 Why consting is good
In Perl, we have the C
Good afternoon,
After some, always healthy, discussion on #parrot I've started a
very simple test file to evaluate some very simple PGE grammars. The
few grammars included in the test should work ok, except test #7 which
is supposed to fail with the current PGE. After the needed PGE
corrections
I wrote:
[snip]
I suppose trying to make '@' mean something different for signatures and for
calls from C (as I have done) is a Bad Idea as long as the same code is used
to parse the signatures in both cases. The easy solution is to choose
a character
other than '@' for one of the directions thou
在 2006/8/12 下午 6:15 時，Nicholas Clark 寫到：
There's nothing technical stopping the Perl 6 tests being on
svn.perl.org,
but in a different svn repository from the current repositories, is
there?
Well, technically yes, except that SVK doesn't support svn:external yet.
Setting a svn:external pro
Am Samstag, 12. August 2006 17:55 schrieb Bob Rogers:
>From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>See "Method Overloading and GC Issues" in Cfunc.pod. The only way
>IMHO to avoid this problem is to run GC at "safe" points at the
>runloop level . . .
>
> Had you considered keeping t
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:00:19 +0200
The continuation barrier is only one nastyness of inferior runloops. The
second problem with it is that it heavily influences the guts of garbage
collection . . .
See "Method Overloading and GC Issu
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 09:44:38PM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote:
> That's assuming that the new repo, say, http://svn.perl.org/
> perl6tests/, can
> give out commit permissions to parrot and pugs committers, yes.
>
> But as Jerry's initial motivation was moving Perl 6 tests to a more
> official
>
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 02:06:27PM +0800, Agent Zhang wrote:
>is $got, $expected, todo :pugs<6.2.13>, :p6p5<0.110>;
>
> Happily, Audrey has already implemented the $?PUGS_VERSION variable,
> which can ease the implementation of such &todo subs:
I've added a %?CONFIG variable which I propose
e
在 2006/8/12 上午 3:01 時，jerry gay 寫到：
for "managed," i have a few ideas. currently, the suite lives in the
pugs repo. this is a fine first approximation, but i believe it will
soon be time to move this suite (it doesn't make sense to keep the
"official" tests in a non-official repo in the long ter
On 8/12/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
for "managed," i have a few ideas. currently, the suite lives in the
pugs repo. this is a fine first approximation, but i believe it will
soon be time to move this suite[3]. the question is, should it be
moved into their own repository, or into the
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:32:47PM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote:
>
> ?b 2006/8/12 ?W?? 3:01 ???Ajerry gay ?g???G
>
> >the question is, should it be moved into their own repository, or
> >into the repo of
> >the "official" perl6 implementation (if such a beast will indeed
> >exist,)
>
> Currentl
11 matches
Mail list logo
