On Apr 24, 2007, at 11:21 PM, chromatic wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 15:31, Nikolay Ananiev wrote:
Why would the developers use Parrot instead of JVM/CLR/Mono?
Parrot is open source today, not *mumble* down the road like the
JVM will be.
Parrot is also widely portable, much like perl
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 15:31, Nikolay Ananiev wrote:
> Why would the developers use Parrot instead of JVM/CLR/Mono?
Parrot is open source today, not *mumble* down the road like the JVM will be.
Parrot supports more dynamic features than only "find method by name at
runtime".
Parrot doesn't h
Nikolay Ananiev wrote:
So, is one of parrot's biggest strengths gone? Are we too late?
Why would the developers use Parrot instead of JVM/CLR/Mono?
We're certainly pleased that we kicked off a revolution in virtual
machines, and that others are beginning to catch on to the fact that
they'll
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
This is what the cstruct-Proposal is for. The cstruct is describing the
internals of a PMC (which happen to consist of C structure items)
Aye. For general information, these are the current draft PDDs that I'm
merging into 1 (or 2) PMC PDDs.
pdd02_vtables.pod
pdd04_d
As we all know, parrot has been in development for 7 years now.
That's a lot of time and many things have changed since then. From my point
of view one of the biggest strengths of Parrot is that it's a target for
many (and why not all?)
dynamic languages and as I know there's no other VM like it.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:30:53PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> > With chromatic's patch in r18323 (RT #42320), and removing the -G
> > flag from the relevant files, I'm now able to run PGE's tests
> > including p5rx.t and 01-regex.t in under 60MB
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 13:30, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > Andy, could you update to r18323, remove the -G's, and see if it
> > now runs to completion on your Solaris box?
> Thanks for the heads-up. I'm afraid testing will have to wait until
> tomorrow. The rsync server at svn.perl.org is still
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> With chromatic's patch in r18323 (RT #42320), and removing the -G
> flag from the relevant files, I'm now able to run PGE's tests
> including p5rx.t and 01-regex.t in under 60MB of virtual
> memory. (See below.)
>
> Andy, could you update to r183
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 03:52:35PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Oh yes. It's swapping like crazy. Sorry I didn't mention that
> explicitly. (I figured it was obvious!) The machine in question has
> 128 MB of physical RAM. [...]
>
> Specifically, I usually do something like:
>
> ulimi
Am Montag, 23. April 2007 23:18 schrieb Jonathan Worthington:
> Proposal: PMCs can have attributes just as classes in HLLs have
> attributes. This is somewhat related to variable sized PMCs; note you
> can leave PMC headers fixed size and just have a pmc_ext like structure
> that is the variable si
Am Dienstag, 24. April 2007 07:45 schrieb chromatic:
> Here's my solution; don't allocate zero-sized buffers. Let them be empty.
Great catch. Thanks.
Indeed - zero-size allocs should just be ignored or/and even the source of
such requests be weeded out.
leo
On Mon Apr 23 13:39:40 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gracias. I attached one more small patch that gets rid of two
> seemingly unnecessary lines in smop_init() - they're easy to miss when
> one's looking at the big picture.
Applied in r18321. Thanks!
--
Matt Diephouse
On 4/24/07, via RT Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The output of the failed tests is attached.
No, it's not. One more time, with feeling ;).
--
Alek Storm
FIRST STEP:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/parrot
$ perl Configure.pl
Parrot Version 0.4.11 Configure 2.0
Copyright (C) 2001-2007, The Perl Foundation.
Hello, I'm Configure. My job is to poke and prod your system to figure out
how to build Parrot. The process is completely automated, unless you passed i
# New Ticket Created by Ron Blaschke
# Please include the string: [perl #42699]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42699 >
This is a follow up for ticket #42587, using Parrot r18304.
SunOS nexenta 5.11 NexentaO
15 matches
Mail list logo
