On Friday 11 May 2007 19:01:51 James Keenan wrote:
> I googled the archives of our mailing list and found no matches for
> 'pod_todo'. So apparently there was no on-list discussion of this
> test before it was committed to trunk. Given how many files it finds
> defective, shouldn't there h
On Friday 11 May 2007 21:26:42 Mike Mattie wrote:
> I am very interested in chromatic's pheme language. I have been reading
> through the code and looking at your TODO list. I thought I would tackle
> some of the easier issues to get a handle on PIR and help out a bit.
Great!
> questions:
>
> 1.
Hello,
I am very interested in chromatic's pheme language. I have been reading through
the code
and looking at your TODO list. I thought I would tackle some of the easier
issues
to get a handle on PIR and help out a bit.
questions:
1. Are you targetting r5 or r6 ? I think r6 would be a better
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #42929]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42929 >
Last night, I ran 'make test' and everything was cool. Tonight, I
ran 'make test' and
On 5/11/07, Alek Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Whew. Thanks for looking over my giant patch :). I've split the original
patch into three parts - testing, specs, and code, and rebased it on
r18494. I've also cut out the code that modified the implementation of
invoke() in the old object sys
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
> Well, I saw some patches [1] floating by which did remove
> PObj_bufstart_external_FLAG. This flag was needed to sync the malloc-based
> allocators with parrots (and COWs) understanding of a 'not owned' / external
> buffer/string memory resou
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Allison Randal via RT wrote:
> Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >
> > I was about to post a patch adding those functions in, but I see that
> > you're in the middle of a much more thorough review than I had attempted,
> > so my patch isn't going to apply anymore, and would probably b
Am Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2007 23:07 schrieb Andrew Dougherty:
> On Wed, 9 May 2007, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > Ok, I've got it compiling, at least. I'll let it run tests overnight and
> > submit a cleaned-up patch tomorrow. I've gone back and reviewed the
> > alignment issue and think I have impleme
On 5/11/07, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/10/07, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:33:41AM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote:
> >
> > On May 9, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> > >So, !s->strlen does scan as quickly and easily.
> > >
> >
> > To
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> But when I read STRING_IS_EMPTY() I stop and wonder "right, how?" and
> stop to look up what it expands to. Which one does need to do, if one
> is chasing down a bug. (Because with a bug, things *aren't* working as
> at least one of the designer or impl
# New Ticket Created by "Alek Storm"
# Please include the string: [perl #42919]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42919 >
Because PIR can't tell the difference between invoking an object PMC and
invoking a sub
11 matches
Mail list logo
