Being generally in favor of moving quickly toward a 1.0 release, I'm
looking at this from the perspective of "what's essential and what's not
essential"?
Allison Randal wrote:
I'd like to do away with the PMC_DATA_IN_EXT flag so the "DPOINTER
*data;" struct element is always in the PMC struc
Josh Wilmes wrote:
At 19:05 on 05/23/2007 PDT, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- better compiler tools than lex and yacc.
Is it necessary (or even fair) to tie compiler components to parrot?
I really don't know how to answer this question.
The compiler tools target Parrot, so that it
By way of introduction, we quickly hit the law of diminishing returns
when we spend a lot of time justifying the existence of Parrot.
Especially when we could be spending that time finishing off Parrot. At
the end of the day, no amount of talking will convince the skeptics. A
completed virtual
On Mon, 28 May 2007 01:45:19 +0200
pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been reading the source code of he virtual machine a bit and found some
> confusing things and other stuff that imho should change.
Don't panic! They are only a 1% of the whole source code ;) The rest is fine and
looks
Hi to everyone!
How can I set a new include path into the library loader of parrot?
A gcc-like '-I' flag would be desirable instead of the raw @INC like perl5 does.
Is the library path crosslanguage? How parrot handles these include paths for
other
languages than pasm/pir? I'm mixing concepts?
I have been reading the source code of he virtual machine a bit and found some
confusing things and other stuff that imho should change.
Most of this patches are merely stupid, so they are easy to fix and will reflect
on a clenaer and reduced source code.
I will probably submit other similar mail
On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:27:37 -0700
chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 14:24:14 Steve Peters wrote:
>
> > free() assumes its passed a void *. mem_sys_free() should take the
> > same type of argument. Assuming that what you are passing to
> > free() will never be modifi
On Mon, 21 May 2007 18:50:30 -0700
Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Mattie wrote:
> >
> > loader : a bit-mask selecting loaders to be included in the
> > search. This arguement is passed by reference. When a matching file
> > is found the value of loader is rese
On Tue, 22 May 2007 14:24:14 -0700
Steve Peters (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Steve Peters
> # Please include the string: [perl #43033]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43033
Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
This doesn't:
.sub zero_check
push_eh one
$N1 = 3 / 0.0
Guessing that imcc is doing constant folding without the guards that
the ops use.
Aye, and the trouble is, I think, that we don't actually have ops that
only take two constants; if I remember co
10 matches
Mail list logo
