Re: Building with icc

2007-06-30 Thread Paul Cochrane
On 07/06/07, Paul Cochrane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: perl Configure.pl --cc=icc --link=icc --ld=icc I tried this, but got the following output from Configure.pl: [EMAIL PROTECTED] parrot_svn2 $ perl Configure.pl --cc=icc --link=icc --ld=icc Parrot Version 0.4.12 Configure 2.0 Copyright (C)

Re: parrot question and stacked patches

2007-06-30 Thread Bram Geron
pancake wrote: (...) Ok, after the presentations.. I have some problems for writing the patches because more than one bug report matches the same source file, and i have to wait everytime for commits before doing anything more. I understand that this is my problem and I should be pacient, but

Re: Building with icc

2007-06-30 Thread Andy Lester
perl Configure.pl --cc=icc --link=icc --ld=icc --ccflags=-I/opt/intel/compiler91/include/ Even with this, I get complaints that: icc: error #10001: could not find directory in which the set of libstdc++ include files resides I've apparently got a libstdc++-devel package installed at

Optimized Build Failures on Win32

2007-06-30 Thread Ron Blaschke
Parrot fails with an optimized build on Win32, Visual C++. Here are a few random observations, not sure if they are pointing to the problem or are merely side effects. It seems like the failures only affect JIT execution. I'm only seeing this with some shootout tests during Cnmake test, as

Re: pdd15: How do I subclass a parrot; PMC class?

2007-06-30 Thread Jonathan Worthington
Patrick R. Michaud wrote: This presumes that every PMC class also has a Namespace PMC associated with it that points to the class. I'm not sure that's true for Parrot PMC classes. It's what I've implemented, though whether it's The Design is another question that I'm not clear on the

[perl #43444] [BUG] 'make' error: No rule to make target `src/path.str'

2007-06-30 Thread James Keenan via RT
I noticed the failure 6/29 at r19501. Binary search of trunk indicates that r19489 passed 'make', but 19495 failed. kid51

Re: t/codingstd/perlcritic.t needs to be optional

2007-06-30 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Patrick R. Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:42:18 -0500 On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:59:38PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: Modified since when? Since the last time the user ran Configure. (For the default test run) I think that this will