[perl #46869] [BUG] t/tools/ops2pmutils/: Failures in 4 test files

2007-10-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
Tonight I again had failures in 3 files in t/tools/ops2pmutils/. t/tools/ops2pmutils/09-prepare_real_opsok 1/38op get_all_eh_p: sequence mismatch: ops.num 168 vs. core.ops 1215 at /home/jimk/work/parrot/lib/Parrot/Ops2pm/Utils.pm line 454. # Looks like you planned 38 tests but only ran 16.

Re: [perl #43309] [TODO] config/auto/byteorder.pm: Write unit tests

2007-10-29 Thread chromatic
On Monday 29 October 2007 19:54:11 James Keenan via RT wrote: > The patch attached provides a refactoring of configuration step class > auto::byteorder along the same lines as other recent refactorings of > auto::* config classes, i.e., the code handling the C probe is > refactored into one intern

[perl #43309] [TODO] config/auto/byteorder.pm: Write unit tests

2007-10-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
The patch attached provides a refactoring of configuration step class auto::byteorder along the same lines as other recent refactorings of auto::* config classes, i.e., the code handling the C probe is refactored into one internal subroutine, while everything that follows is refactored into an inte

Re: [perl #43338] [TODO] config/auto/va_ptr.pm: Write unit tests

2007-10-29 Thread James E Keenan
Paul Johnson wrote: Note that you can merge coverage databases, or generate reports from more than one database, for this very reason. If we had people in addition to myself working on these tests, I'd explore that possibility -- particularly if s/he were on BSD or Win32. For now, the co

Re: [perl #43338] [TODO] config/auto/va_ptr.pm: Write unit tests

2007-10-29 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 04:39:42PM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote: > Although the percent of statements in this class's source code covered > by the test suite and by Configure.pl itself is lower than I normally > would settle for > (http://thenceforward.net/parrot/coverage/configure-build/confi

[perl #43338] [TODO] config/auto/va_ptr.pm: Write unit tests

2007-10-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
Although the percent of statements in this class's source code covered by the test suite and by Configure.pl itself is lower than I normally would settle for (http://thenceforward.net/parrot/coverage/configure-build/config-auto-va_ptr-pm.html), the uncovered statements are highly platform-specific.

[perl #47011] [TODO] VTABLE method 'new_from_string' is deprecated

2007-10-29 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer # Please include the string: [perl #47011] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47011 > In pdd17_pmc.pod it is stated that 'new_from_string' is deprecated. The existing

pdd19 comments

2007-10-29 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
Just a few comments from a brief review of pdd19: > =item 'char constant' > > Are delimited by single-quotes (C<'>). They are taken to be ASCII encoded. No > escape sequences are processed. What exactly does "They are taken to be ASCII encoded" mean here? For example, what happens if I write a s

[perl #44171] [TODO] config/auto/attributes.pm: Write unit tests

2007-10-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
Either config/auto/attributes.pm is now DWIMming or I don't understand it correctly. Please help me determine which. Consider the first of two files attached (neither of which is yet in trunk): t/configure/114-auto_attributes-02.t. It's set up like many of the other t/configure/*.t tests, no no

[svn:parrot-pdd] r22590 - trunk/docs/pdds

2007-10-29 Thread allison
Author: allison Date: Mon Oct 29 10:41:29 2007 New Revision: 22590 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod Log: [pdd] Add more detail on index value to 'get_eh'. Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod

[perl #45479] [CAGE] config/gen/PodText.pm: Find better location

2007-10-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
> > Since all the real coding on this package was done before I joined > the project, I may not be fully aware of its rationale. Was it once > a configuration step, but then dropped? Is it meant to be an > optional configuration step? > > Would we be better off by reformulating it as a P

Parrot Bug Summary

2007-10-29 Thread Parrot Bug Summary
Parrot Bug Summary http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html Generated at Mon Oct 29 13:00:06 2007 GMT --- * Numbers * New Issues * Overview of Open Issues * Ticket Status By Version * Requestors with m

Re: [perl #46007] [CAGE] licensing cleanup

2007-10-29 Thread François PERRAD
At 08:25 27/10/2007 -0700, you wrote: On Tue Oct 02 13:39:30 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Parrot is no longer licensed under the GPL directly (though it is > available under the GPL through the Artistic 2.0). Update or remove > references to the GPL license in these files: > > debian/copyrigh