Re: [perl #54992] [CAGE] Add a 'codetest' make target

2008-05-29 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 07:26:29PM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote: > On Wed May 28 18:57:31 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I will work on this. Attached is *part* of the solution. > > > > > > And here is a more complete solution. (In the course of its > development, I ran it and it identi

Re: [perl #55040] [TODO] Remove hcf opcode

2008-05-29 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:25:17AM -0700, chromatic wrote: > On Thursday 29 May 2008 08:45:26 Will Coleda wrote: > > > Even if there is disagreement on whether the opcode itself should be > > removed, there appears to be consensus that the tests need to be > > removed. We can always do that first

Re: [perl #55012] [CAGE] [PATCH] list_dump and intlist_dump are never used

2008-05-29 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Will Coleda via RT wrote: > On Wed May 28 14:56:11 2008, julianalbo wrote: > > The function intlist_dump in src/intlist.c is never used. > > > > If defined LIST_DEBUG, it calls list_dump. That function is present in > > src/list.c but is static, and is als

[perl #55050] [CAGE] [PATCH] invalid warnings in g++

2008-05-29 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by NotFound # Please include the string: [perl #55050] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55050 > Recent versions of g++ warns when gcc warnings that makes no sense in c++ are used, and parr

[perl #55050] [CAGE] [PATCH] invalid warnings in g++

2008-05-29 Thread NotFound
Sorry, forgot to check coding standards. Fixed now. -- Salu2 Index: config/auto/warnings.pm === --- config/auto/warnings.pm (revision 27920) +++ config/auto/warnings.pm (working copy) @@ -44,13 +44,10 @@ -W -Wall

Re: [perl #55040] [TODO] Remove hcf opcode

2008-05-29 Thread chromatic
On Thursday 29 May 2008 08:45:26 Will Coleda wrote: > Even if there is disagreement on whether the opcode itself should be > removed, there appears to be consensus that the tests need to be > removed. We can always do that first to deal with the tickets relating > to that, and then discuss the mer

[perl #54986] [PATCH] gcc4.0 darwin ppc doesnt like -bundle as the 1rst argument

2008-05-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Thu May 29 06:13:00 2008, coke wrote: > > Just an FYI, I happen to have intel/OSX 10.4 lying about. > Ah, I was hazy as to when the intels made their appearance. So that's another combination on which we should test this patch, tetragon's and other Darwin-related patches. kid51

Re: [perl #55040] [TODO] Remove hcf opcode

2008-05-29 Thread Will Coleda
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:21 AM, via RT Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Will Coleda > # Please include the string: [perl #55040] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55040 > > > >

[perl #55012] [CAGE] [PATCH] list_dump and intlist_dump are never used

2008-05-29 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Wed May 28 14:56:11 2008, julianalbo wrote: > The function intlist_dump in src/intlist.c is never used. > > If defined LIST_DEBUG, it calls list_dump. That function is present in > src/list.c but is static, and is also never used. > > The attached patch gets rid of both functions and the LIST_

[perl #55040] [TODO] Remove hcf opcode

2008-05-29 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #55040] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55040 > While this may have served a pedagogical purpose some time ago*, it's better left in the

Re: [perl #54986] Fwd: [PATCH] gcc4.0 darwin ppc doesnt like -bundle as the 1rst argument

2008-05-29 Thread Will Coleda
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:18 AM, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed May 28 10:52:08 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi >> >> Seems that $ c++ -v : Target: powerpc-apple-darwin7 gcc version 4.0.0 > doesnt >> like -bundle as the 1rst argument : >> >> c++ -bundle -undefined dyna

Re: [perl #54920] [PATCH] Compiling pcc.c on Solaris10-x86

2008-05-29 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Andrew Johnson wrote: > tiger% ./parrot -t t/dynoplibs/myops_3.pir > 0 print "neither here\n" > neither here > 2 hcf > Segmentation fault Welcome to the club of people who've wasted time chasing this particularly silly test. 'hcf' is supposed to stand for 'halt an

[perl #54986] Fwd: [PATCH] gcc4.0 darwin ppc doesnt like -bundle as the 1rst argument

2008-05-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Wed May 28 10:52:08 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi > > Seems that $ c++ -v : Target: powerpc-apple-darwin7 gcc version 4.0.0 doesnt > like -bundle as the 1rst argument : > > c++ -bundle -undefined dynamic_lookup -L/usr/local/lib > -L/Users/paco/parrot/parrot/blib/lib -L/sw/lib \ > -

Re: Comments on parrotblog

2008-05-29 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
On 5/28/08, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be helpful to have comments that are posted on articles on > parrotblog sent to this mailing list? Very helpful IMO. kjs

Re: [perl #54920] [PATCH] Compiling pcc.c on Solaris10-x86

2008-05-29 Thread Andrew Johnson
tiger% ./parrot -t t/dynoplibs/myops_3.pir 0 print "neither here\n" neither here 2 hcf Segmentation fault When run under a debugger, it looks like this: (dbx) run -t t/dynoplibs/myops_3.pir Running: parrot -t t/dynoplibs/myops_3.pir (process id 15185) Reading myops_ops.so 0 print

[perl #55012] [CAGE] [PATCH] list_dump and intlist_dump are never used

2008-05-29 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by NotFound # Please include the string: [perl #55012] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55012 > The function intlist_dump in src/intlist.c is never used. If defined LIST_DEBUG, it calls l

[perl #54986] Fwd: [PATCH] gcc4.0 darwin ppc doesnt like -bundle as the 1rst argument

2008-05-29 Thread Paco Linux
# New Ticket Created by "Paco Linux" # Please include the string: [perl #54986] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=54986 > Hi Seems that $ c++ -v : Target: powerpc-apple-darwin7 gcc version 4.0.0 doesnt like -b

Re: Mixing named and positional values

2008-05-29 Thread Allison Randal
Patrick R. Michaud wrote: Since there's a fair amount of existing code that may be doing slurpy positionals before named parameters, I propose, perhaps as an interim step, that we say that positional slurpy array parameters must come after all positional and lookahead parameters (but could come