[svn:parrot-pdd] r28231 - in trunk/docs/pdds: . draft

2008-06-10 Thread chromatic
Author: chromatic Date: Tue Jun 10 23:11:50 2008 New Revision: 28231 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd01_overview.pod trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd04_datatypes.pod trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd08_keys.pod trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd11_extending.pod tr

[perl #55566] [BUG] Configure.pl dies on gnu/hurd

2008-06-10 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Tue Jun 10 05:32:21 2008, coke wrote: > > From: Nathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:57 AM > Subject: parrot init/hints for the Hurd > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I tried compiling parrot on the Hurd, but Configure.pl complained: > > Loading platform and local hints

Re: [perl #55504] Failing test t/op/spawnw.t

2008-06-10 Thread NotFound
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:00 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could Configure.pl warn when there's no LANG? How portable is that? Actually Configure.pl warns at his start when the value of LANG is not supported by perl, being itself a perl program. But I don't know if this condition c

Re: [perl #55504] Failing test t/op/spawnw.t

2008-06-10 Thread chromatic
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 14:47:50 NotFound wrote: > (Looks like the second message in this thread was not forwarded to the > list). > > There are several problems related to LANG. As this ticket shows, perl > warns when it has no support for the locale specified, and the > warnings interferes with

Re: [perl #55504] Failing test t/op/spawnw.t

2008-06-10 Thread NotFound
(Looks like the second message in this thread was not forwarded to the list). There are several problems related to LANG. As this ticket shows, perl warns when it has no support for the locale specified, and the warnings interferes with the output expected by the tests. Also several Configure che

[perl #55588] [META] June 2008 Hackathon targets

2008-06-10 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #55588] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55588 > Any tickets you plan to work on at the hackathon, have this ticket refer to them, so we c

[perl #55586] [BUG] Parrot no longer uses HLL_map types?

2008-06-10 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #55586] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55586 > This code: $ cat tclsh.pir .HLL 'Tcl', 'tcl_group' .sub main :main .param pmc argv f

Re: Adding ATTRs to a pmc.

2008-06-10 Thread chromatic
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 09:54:02 Will Coleda wrote: > >> Is this right? Do we need to copy and modify this everywhere we want > >> to use ATTR? It seems like, if this wrangling is actually necessary, > >> that we should be automatically constructing set_attr_str() with the > >> pmc2c compiler. > >

Re: Adding ATTRs to a pmc.

2008-06-10 Thread Will Coleda
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:45 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 10 June 2008 07:50:41 Will Coleda wrote: > >> I tried to replace tcl's tclproc.pir (a subclass of Sub that added >> attributes via PIR) with a pmc version. >> >> Here's my first attempt: >> >> pmclass TclProc >>

Re: Adding ATTRs to a pmc.

2008-06-10 Thread chromatic
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 07:50:41 Will Coleda wrote: > I tried to replace tcl's tclproc.pir (a subclass of Sub that added > attributes via PIR) with a pmc version. > > Here's my first attempt: > > pmclass TclProc > dynpmc > extends Sub > group tcl_group > hll Tcl > maps

[perl #55580] [CPAN] Remove old versions of Parrot (~chips)

2008-06-10 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #55580] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55580 > The following old versions of parrot on CPAN should be removed. They'll still be availabl

[perl #55578] [CPAN] Remove old versions of Parrot (~simon)

2008-06-10 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #55578] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55578 > The following old versions of parrot on CPAN should be removed. They'll still be availabl

Adding ATTRs to a pmc.

2008-06-10 Thread Will Coleda
I tried to replace tcl's tclproc.pir (a subclass of Sub that added attributes via PIR) with a pmc version. Here's my first attempt: pmclass TclProc dynpmc extends Sub group tcl_group hll Tcl mapsSub { ATTR STRING *PIR_source; /* the PIR level source */

Re: [perl #44499] Move cstrings to String Structure

2008-06-10 Thread NotFound
I've made some more work on this patch. First, fixed an error that breaks pdb build. Then, replacing the string_to_cstring function in a lot more places, and adding a new packfile function to find the location of a label without strings copying. The latter gives a noticeable speedup. I'm not sure a

[perl #55566] [BUG] Configure.pl dies on gnu/hurd

2008-06-10 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Tue Jun 10 05:32:21 2008, coke wrote: > Forwarding to open a ticket. > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Nathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:57 AM > Subject: parrot init/hints for the Hurd > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I tried compiling parrot on

[perl #55566] Fwd: parrot init/hints for the Hurd

2008-06-10 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #55566] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55566 > Forwarding to open a ticket. -- Forwarded message -- From: Nathan Gray

[perl #36695] [CAGE] t/src failures after make shared

2008-06-10 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Sun Jun 08 19:49:27 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun Jun 08 19:12:06 2008, coke wrote: > > > > > I take this to mean `perl Configure.pl --parrot_is_shared`. > > > > Okay. I just ran that command, then ran 'make' and 'make test'. > Everything passed. There were no significant differ