Applied in r29959. tetragon++. Marking ticket resolved.
I just merged in the pdd25cx branch. Resolving all the conflicts took
several hours (124 files, 1 minute or more per file...), but otherwise
it went smoothly.
The biggest changes you'll notice are the new exception system, a vastly
reduced usage of the remaining stack (though it's not complete
Author: allison
Date: Sat Aug 2 15:45:13 2008
New Revision: 29952
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd08_keys.pod
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd17_pmc.pod
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Added:
trunk/src/pmc/exceptionhandler.pmc
- copied u
Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
Jonathan Worthington schrieb:
Allison Randal wrote:
Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
We could always do the 12th AND the 16th, just for fun and bonus
productivity (if everyone isn't exhausted from a day of hacking and
three days of conference)? ;-)
Patrick and I will
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:07:49AM +0100, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:06 PM, via RT Will Coleda wrote
> > From PDD19:
> >
> > =item .pragma n_operators [deprecated]
>
> does this mean that by default all ops will have the n_ prefix by default?
> That would imply some variants
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:20 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: coke
> Date: Sat Aug 2 08:20:01 2008
> New Revision: 29940
>
> Modified:
> branches/pdd25cx/languages/tcl/src/macros.pir
>
> Log:
> [tcl] The error message is actually in the 'message' slot now; having the
> wrong name here
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Allison Randal via RT
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> In r29934 of the branch, I can't even get tcl to build, it kee
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Allison Randal via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In r29934 of the branch, I can't even get tcl to build, it keeps
>> complaining about calls to tcl_error_s which it says doesn't exist.
>>
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Allison Randal via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In r29934 of the branch, I can't even get tcl to build, it keeps
> complaining about calls to tcl_error_s which it says doesn't exist.
> Since you mentioned you were eliminating the versions of tcl_error
> identical
On Sat Aug 02 05:06:31 2008, rurban wrote:
> On Sat Jun 14 17:17:03 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Can anyone on FreeBSD give us an update on this issue?
>
> freebsd7, recent parrot svn (r29922)
> passes the t/op/trans.t tests
>
>
Thanks for looking into this, Reini. Now, would these failu
I have tried this patch out in a sandbox from trunk and, at the very
least, it does no harm with anything up through Parrot's 'make test'.
I rarely go into the languages or, for example, run Rakudo's 'make
test', so I'm unclear as to how to use this. What would I do after I've
called:
cd languag
- Original Message -
From: "Robert G. Jakabosky (via RT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [perl #57504] [PATCH][Lua] Fixed 64bit bug in Lua bytecode
decoder/translator.
Changes to 'languages/lua/t/os.t':
1 test from 'os.t' fails on 64bit systems because 'os.time()' does not
return
a 'ni
Andy Dougherty schrieb:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
Can we get an update as to the issues raised in this ticket?
The general issue
"installeld parrot conflicts with dev parrot"
-- at least when a shared libparrot.so is used
is, as far as I know, unsolved. A l
On Sat Jun 14 17:17:03 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can anyone on FreeBSD give us an update on this issue?
freebsd7, recent parrot svn (r29922)
passes the t/op/trans.t tests
Determining JIT capability.yes
It even works with freebsd's make, not only
# New Ticket Created by Robert G. Jakabosky
# Please include the string: [perl #57504]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57504 >
Hello everyone,
This is my first patch to the parrot project.
This patch
In r29934 of the branch, I can't even get tcl to build, it keeps
complaining about calls to tcl_error_s which it says doesn't exist.
Since you mentioned you were eliminating the versions of tcl_error
identical to 'die', I went through and replaced the calls to tcl_error
with calls to die. It builds
chromatic and I have fixed the majority of the language issues (see
child tickets for specific comments). I will merge the branch back into
trunk first thing tomorrow morning (Saturday, August 2nd).
On Tue Jul 22 06:10:41 2008, fperrad wrote:
>
> In fact 'docall' uses a pushaction.
I modified 'docall' so it no longer uses pushaction, and all Lua tests
are now passing.
# New Ticket Created by "jason switzer"
# Please include the string: [perl #57522]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57522 >
The test harness used the default verbosity mode provided by TAP::Harness.
It seemed
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Patrick and I will be hacking on the 12th and the 16th. If you've not
seen Copenhagen before, I could forgive you for wanting to spend a day
enjoying the city rather than hacking though - it's nice! :-)
I have, in fact, seen Copenhagen before, and if it weren't fo
20 matches
Mail list logo
