Christoph Otto wrote:
I'd appreciate comments or a quick code review as to whether I should
apply the patch as-is (sans randomization) once the failing OrderedHash
test passes. It's admittedly not a complete solution, but it does hide
Parrot's hash seed from any PARROT_EXPORT functions and mak
# New Ticket Created by (Andreas J. Koenig)
# Please include the string: [perl #61116]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61116 >
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64
arch= x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-mult
Prompted by the recent thread on literals...
This is Rakudo Perl 6, revision 33618 built on parrot 0.8.1-devel
This works:
$ perl6 -e 'say Bool::True.perl'
Bool::True
This doesn't:
$ perl6 -e 'say True.perl'
Method 'perl' not found for invocant of class ''
current instr.: '_block11' pc 26 (EVAL_
kjs has left a new comment on your post "Episode 3: Squaak Details and
First Steps":
refers to the rule (or token) expression. If you declare a
rule "foo", and you want to use it, you need to put the pointy brackets
around it, like .
Posted by kjs to Parrot at December 6, 2008 7:14 AM
srottak has left a new comment on your post "Episode 3: Squaak Details
and First Steps":
Ok, I have 2 grammars:
grammar test::Grammar is PCT::Grammar;
rule TOP {
*
[ $ || ]
{*}
}
rule foo {
'hello'
{*}
}
and
grammar test::Grammar is PCT::Grammar;
rule TOP {
*
[ $ || ]
{*}
}
rule expression
Hi!
I have reported parrot bug at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=61092
But mb I use wrong mail? I know you use Track now, and wonder why I
got response from rt.perl.org instead of Track.
ihrd
# New Ticket Created by "gabriele renzi"
# Please include the string: [perl #61088]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61088 >
the current HLLCompiler infrastructure seems to be an incomplete REPL,
since it only
Thanks - can you also let us know the following:
What version of windows are you using?
Which compiler (including version)?
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Nikolay Ananiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tested with r33568. The bug is still there.
>
> - Original Message - From: "Will Coled
> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:03:17 -0800, "Parrot via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> t/op/callingNOK 73/98
git bisect blames https://svn.perl.org/parrot/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
andreas
Tested with r33568. The bug is still there.
- Original Message -
From: "Will Coleda via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 10:00 PM
Subject: [perl #41095] [BUG] Segfault in test.exe during Configuration
Can someone test this with a re
# New Ticket Created by Ilya Belikin
# Please include the string: [perl #61092]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61092 >
Hi!
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.6.22-3-amd64
arch= x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi
cc=
Andrew Whitworth via RT wrote:
> On Tue Dec 02 05:50:02 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think it is wrong that the Win32 installation package for Parrot
>> refuses to install if not run by an administrator.
>>
>> I simply do not want to pollute my system and am therefore using a
>> no
12 matches
Mail list logo