On Tuesday 23 December 2008 18:47:23 Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> On the other hand, I'm somewhat concerned that Parrot 1.0 will either
> itself be rather slow, or will architecturally force HLL implementations
> to be slow. While looking for the IRC discussion mentioned by Coke, I
> found the fol
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 17:31 -0800, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
> chromatic mentioned on #parrot that if we remove PIC, we're going to break
> all the
> predereferenced runcores. After some discussion, this probably means ripping
> out:
>
> 16:42 <@chromatic> Everything other than the default core
chromatic via RT wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 December 2008 14:53:15 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>> I am seeing some new warnings, if I find the time I'll file a new bug on
>> those. An easy quick one to fix would be this:
>>
>> cc: Info: ./include/parrot/sub.h, line 47: Trailing comma found in
>> enume
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 14:53:15 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> I am seeing some new warnings, if I find the time I'll file a new bug on
> those. An easy quick one to fix would be this:
>
> cc: Info: ./include/parrot/sub.h, line 47: Trailing comma found in
> enumerator list. (trailcomma)
> } sub_
chromatic via RT wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2008 18:00:32 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>> First we get a couple of warnings fro some files, but then one file
>> refuses to compile (see below). I didn't notice any other warnings or
>> failures during Configure.pl and/or during compilation.
>
On Thursday 11 December 2008 06:14:36 François PERRAD wrote:
> Since the merge of the branch ppd22io, the mode of the stdin stream has
> changed. Currently, it isn't possible to peek on stdin.
>
> $ cat peek.pir
> .sub 'main'
> $P0 = getstdin
> $S0 = peek $S0
> .end
>
> $
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 18:00:32 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> First we get a couple of warnings fro some files, but then one file
> refuses to compile (see below). I didn't notice any other warnings or
> failures during Configure.pl and/or during compilation.
Thanks for the report.
> src/op
James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Wed Dec 17 13:29:59 2008, kjs wrote:
I thought I closed it last time. Trying again :-)
kjs
The ticket has 3 dependencies which are still open. Is it possible that
the ticket cannot be resolved until these dependencies are resolved?
Yes, but you can just remove
