On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 15:53, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:09 PM, kjstol wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Will Coleda via RT <
>> parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue Jul 04 19:30:44 2006, autri...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> > IMCC currently relies on a l
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:09 PM, kjstol wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Will Coleda via RT <
> parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue Jul 04 19:30:44 2006, autri...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > IMCC currently relies on a lot of static globals to carry state, and
>> > cannot relia
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Will Coleda via RT <
parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org> wrote:
> On Tue Jul 04 19:30:44 2006, autri...@gmail.com wrote:
> > IMCC currently relies on a lot of static globals to carry state, and
> > cannot reliably restore them when an error occurs. (grep for
> > "st
On Thursday 12 February 2009 13:14:42 Will Coleda via RT wrote:
> Here's a shorter example that still generates a bus error for me on
> darwin/x86
Oh look, it's an order of destruction problem.
> And here's a partial bt from the bus error:
> #0 0x0001 in ?? ()
> #1 0x0107f318 in Parrot_exi
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Will Coleda via RT <
parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org> wrote:
> On Fri Oct 19 17:20:38 2007, particle wrote:
> > i suggest we migrate all existing code to the new options at once, and
> > mark the old options as deprecated. however, i'd like to see the old
> > opt
