- Original Message -
From: "chromatic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> I would expect 'does' instead of
'isa'. Perhaps I missed Dan's
> explanation of the difference between 'can', 'isa', and 'does'. Maybe
> I'm thinking of 'has', though.
Though I'm not familiar with the answer that's "official" fo
It occurred to me tonight, that those looking for a compiler project
involving Parrot might consider a Sather compiler. It'd have to wait
for objects(and thus likely Parrot 0.1), but it'd be an interesting
language to have available as a testing tool for the object-oriented
capabilities of Par
On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 11:49 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 1:37 PM + 1/10/03, Peter Haworth wrote:
This will mean we can't support Eiffel
Nope. :)
What it means is that the proposed base object system won't work for
eiffel.
Actually, if you really want Eiffel to compile to Parrot,
Using Mac OS X 10.1.5, on which I've successfully built 0.0.6 and 0.0.7.
[localhost:~/parrot.1/languages/imcc] chris% make
anyop.o definition of _n_symbols in section (__DATA,__common)
make: *** [imcc] Error 1
[localhost:~/parrot.1/languages/imcc] chris%
Then when I try to run a simple "Hel
On Tuesday, August 20, 2002, at 01:11 AM, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> This is a weird implementation artifact, which should probably be
> documented. While real Perl gathers up all the statements you put
> outside
> of any function into a sort of "main", for the time being you'll need to
> put all t
Maybe I'm just doing something wrong...
I make parrot, which goes smoothly, then make IMCC, which chokes on
"long long". Then I "perl pconfig.pl" and "make" and after two or three
tries a full Perl6grammar.pm magically shows up. I'm still scratching
my head over that one.
Then when I try to
