> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:39:33AM -0600, Joseph Guhlin wrote:
> > Pardon my ignorance on the whole issue but I'm just a lurker trying to
> > understand enough to help out. =)
> > I know security on parrot like this would be difficult, and this thread
> > is specifically about securing PASM, but
> I've been thinking about how to run un-trusted code,
> without having to audit every line, or use some sort of sandbox,
> and was wondering if Parrot could provide a Mandator Access
> Control mechanism (ala SE Linux/Flask).
I think that this is a great idea.
> When assembling Parrot, the assemb
