On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I committed a new multiarray.pmc, now based on list.c. It's not totally
> finished yet (the clone codes needs some polishing to call the init_pmc
> method) and needs a lot more tests.
>
> But I hate failing tests ...
>
> leo
>
Well done Leo you
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Jonathan Sillito sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > I have been playing with classes and instances for parrot. In
> > the process I found I needed a way to pass more information when
> > creating new pmcs. So the attached patch adds th
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Leon Brocard wrote:
>
> > Leopold Toetsch sent the following bits through the ether:
> >
> >
> >>So I rewrote the base routines almost from scratch and have currently a
> >>file named list.c
> >>
> >
> > I for one am confused as to t
> - can handle sparse arrays, saving many MBs for very sparse arrays
What is the complexity on the algoritm?
/Josef
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Josef Hook wrote:
>
> >
>
> >>Congrats to you too. So, should I start maintaining a birthday
> >>database for the summaries? Probably not.
> >>
> >
> > 23 on 26th :-)
>
>
&
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Piers Cawley wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Piers Cawley wrote:
> >
> >> Happy birthday to me!
> >
> >
> > Congratulations.
> >
> >> ... by my turning 35 on the 15th
> >
> >
> > 44 on 16th - yes Sept.
>
> Congrats to you too. So, should I s
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Aldo Calpini wrote:
>
> I couldn't find any example of using a MultiArray PMC.
> I tried on my own, but failed miserably.
>
> from what I've seen, it seems that is impossible to
> properly initialize a multidimensional MultiArray.
>
> I've tried this:
>
> new P1
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:46:38PM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> > Steve Fink wrote:
> > > Here is the new PMC I keep babbling about. Before I commit it, any
> > > comments? Like, does anybody think this should be named differently?
> > > It's really a dequ
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 1:39 PM +0200 9/6/02, Josef Hook wrote:
> >On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> >> At 1:40 PM +0100 9/5/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >> >I believe applying the patch is the right thing, because it'
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 1:40 PM +0100 9/5/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >I believe applying the patch is the right thing, because it's progress
> >on where we are, but I think (not fully formed yet) that we would benefit
> >from finer granularity on what can get modified
>
>
On 2 Sep 2002, Tom Hughes wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That explains why you are not seeing the last component. You are also
> > missing the first one for some reason. The most likely cause would be
> > that you have already used
On 2 Sep 2002, Tom Hughes wrote:
> This loop stops as soon as key_next() becomes NULL which means that
> you never process the last key component. I would guess that you want
> to make the first line into this:
>
> while (key != NULL) {
what can i say. OOPS :-)
/j
I've discovered a "feature" when using the new key implementation.
It seems that key_next function dosent walk down the chain of keyes like
the old key->next pointer did.
I've managed to reproduce this behaviour many times.
Consider this pasm code:
new P0, .MultiArray[2;3;2;1;1;1]
It's a fact that we have a problem with pmc's that has custom functions
which dosent fit into the vtable. Therefore i suggest we add a pointer in
pmc struct that points to a function list, Also adding 3
functions to vtable struct that manipulates this list.
register_function( PMC *p, void *func
I've just got a cvaazy idea. Why not have a multihash.pmc, multdimensional
hashes. I've been going through perlhash code and my multiarray code and,
as i see it, its doable. Why would we want something like that one
could ask? One idea is for translation from different languages ex:
new P0, .
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 3:50 PM -0400 8/17/02, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >At 3:07 PM +0200 8/14/02, Josef Hook wrote:
> >>I've moved all code into one file now.
> >
> >Cool. Would someone commit this, please?
>
> Nevermind--I did.
&g
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Tom Hughes wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What I realised last night however is that there is enough space in
> > the private flags on the PMC for the type information and I can then
> > attach the data direc
Sorry for the delay i've had a busy week.
This patch adds the tests.
/josef
--- pmc.t.orig Wed Aug 14 14:51:56 2002
+++ pmc.t Wed Aug 14 14:43:00 2002
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#! perl -w
-use Parrot::Test tests => 65;
+use Parrot::Test tests => 68;
use Test::More;
my $fp_equality
I've moved all code into one file now.
/Josef
diff -urN parrot.orig/MANIFEST parrot/MANIFEST
--- parrot.orig/MANIFESTMon Aug 12 17:59:49 2002
+++ parrot/MANIFEST Mon Aug 12 18:01:36 2002
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
classes/default.pmc
classes/genclass.pl
classes/intqueue.pmc
+class
> > If putting all the code into matrix.pmc is going to be a problem
I see another problem coming up which i dont have the exact solution to.
How are we going to fit operations like
det() ludcmp() inverse() solve() transp() and others into vtable.
By that i dont mean that they should exist in v
On 9 Aug 2002, Simon Cozens wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Josef Hook) writes:
> > no more matrix_core.c matrix_core.h?
>
> No, they've been replaced by nebuchadnezzar.c and chosen_one.h.
By that you mean?
>
> --
> >but I'm one guy working weekends - what
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 10:00 AM +0200 8/9/02, Josef Hook wrote:
> >On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> >> At 9:40 AM +0200 8/9/02, Josef Hook wrote:
> >> >I hate to bring this up again but i must. Dan what's the s
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 9:40 AM +0200 8/9/02, Josef Hook wrote:
> >I hate to bring this up again but i must. Dan what's the status on my
> >matrix patch ? I would apreciate some feedback if its good or bad?
> >If its going to be applied or not?
&
I hate to bring this up again but i must. Dan what's the status on my
matrix patch ? I would apreciate some feedback if its good or bad?
If its going to be applied or not?
Do you want me to change anything?
Until it gets applied i feel there's no idea to improve current code.
It's hard to cod
24 matches
Mail list logo
