I would instead suggest that we pick a suitable 'dynamic' language to write
the code generator in, so it can be self-hosting.
Regards,
Stephen Thorne.
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 19:25, Michal Wallace wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, K Stol wrote:
> Really, there's a ton of overlap between the various
> "high level" languages that parrot wants to support.
> Maybe we could put together a generic code generator
> that everyone could use? Obviously, it would hav
? It seems thats in a bit of doubt (based on the
comments about the Python compiler using C code and having to use a drop-in
replacement code generator to solve the bootstrap issue).
Regards,
Stephen Thorne.