Re: Debug ops?

2004-11-01 Thread KJ
Dan Sugalski wrote: I'm considering adding in some new ops and a command-line switch to help debug parrot code, but before I did I figured I'd better throw it out to the list for some debugging. (This seems like something which could be of good general use, and as such I'd like to hash it out, d

Dynoplibs fail

2004-10-31 Thread KJ
Hello, I tried to experiment with dynamic ops, but I didn't get the test running. Is this a known problem? for the record, I did the following, after building parrot: -- I'm in the root directory of Parrot -- export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.:blib/lib make -s make shared make -C dynoplibs Just as described

Re: Real/internal Exceptions

2004-10-01 Thread KJ
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Kj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But what is actually an internal error? (are those "this-should-never-happen" situations that are not expected? Yep. A real exception is an exception within the VM that can be caught by user programs (right?).

Re: Real/internal Exceptions

2004-10-01 Thread KJ
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Kj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Just wondering (again), in order to be able to follow discussion on matters: What is the difference between an "internal" exception and a "real" exception (as if the first one isn't

Real/internal Exceptions

2004-09-29 Thread KJ
Hello, Just wondering (again), in order to be able to follow discussion on matters: What is the difference between an "internal" exception and a "real" exception (as if the first one isn't a real exception...). I suspect a "real" exception is a exception object that a user program also can creat

Why lexical pads

2004-09-24 Thread KJ
Hello, I've been wondering for some time about this, so I thought, why not ask. The thing is, I've been playing a few times with (Parrot, but also .NET) compilers, and my conclusion was that the most difficult part is getting assignments right (when by value, when by ref, etc.). (that is, any cons

Korean character set info

2004-04-22 Thread kj
with johab. I do know it is a legacy charset, but I don't know how much it is still used. Technically, ASCII is legacy, too. :) Do we have any local experts on Japanese charsets? If not, I can do a little bit of research there, too. Cheers, ~kj

Re: Constant strings - again

2004-04-22 Thread kj
of the question, but that's the best I can do for now. Cheers, ~kj

Re: Constant strings - again

2004-04-22 Thread kj
he will be too busy for the next little while. He did say that he will pass on the info to another person who might be able to lend a hand, though. Hopefully you'll have your wish soon, Dan. Cheers, ~kj

Re: Website maintainer needed!

2004-04-20 Thread kj
gh the existing site will help prepare me more for doing actual Parrot work. Volunteers very welcome--chime in, we'll hook you up with Robert and the appropriate access, and you can have at it. *chime* Cheers, ~kj

Mac OS X 10.1.5 test results

2002-11-20 Thread kj
ok 2/79 skipped: various reasons t/pmc/scratchpadok t/pmc/sub...ok All tests successful, 7 subtests skipped. Files=38, Tests=534, 760 wallclock secs (523.31 cusr + 97.70 csys = 621.01 CPU) Cheers, ~kj

Re: Tinderbox

2002-11-19 Thread kj
derived stable (which is of course different than the Jaguar stable) and no failures with the beta (3.1-derived, but derived from a release before the Jaguar stock compiler). Cheers, ~kj

Re: [perl #18170] [PATCH] very complete lexical scope implementation

2002-11-18 Thread kj
tests successful, 7 subtests skipped. Files=37, Tests=506, 1330 wallclock secs (506.26 cusr + 106.24 csys = 612.50 CPU) Cheers, ~kj

Compiler version solves Darwin/PPC test failures (was Re: [perl #18170] [PATCH] very complete lexical scope implementation)

2002-11-18 Thread kj
a look at that might well have 'er showing green on the tinderbox reports. Cheers, ~kj

Re: [perl #18170] [PATCH] very complete lexical scope implementation

2002-11-15 Thread kj
thing to do with the latter? I'm still learning the internals, and haven't quite figured that out yet. Cheers, ~kj