Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-29 Thread Steve Fink
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:38:12AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 9:33 PM -0800 1/28/02, Steve Fink wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:36:19PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 7:47 PM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:07:06PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At

Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-29 Thread Steve Fink
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:10:56AM -0800, Steve Fink wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:38:12AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 9:33 PM -0800 1/28/02, Steve Fink wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:36:19PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 7:47 PM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: On

Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-28 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 1:55 AM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: This patch seems to have slipped by in the post New Year's haze. It updates Parrot's version of Test::More to 0.41 and makes Parrot::Test use Test::Builder instead of doing Evil things to Test::More. Where's Test/Builder.pm, though? --

Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-28 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:07:06PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 1:55 AM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: This patch seems to have slipped by in the post New Year's haze. It updates Parrot's version of Test::More to 0.41 and makes Parrot::Test use Test::Builder instead of doing Evil

Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-28 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 7:47 PM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:07:06PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 1:55 AM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: This patch seems to have slipped by in the post New Year's haze. It updates Parrot's version of Test::More to 0.41 and makes

Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-28 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:36:19PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 7:47 PM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:07:06PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 1:55 AM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: This patch seems to have slipped by in the post New Year's haze.

Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-28 Thread Steve Fink
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:36:19PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 7:47 PM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:07:06PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 1:55 AM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: This patch seems to have slipped by in the post New Year's haze.

Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-28 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:33 PM -0800 1/28/02, Steve Fink wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:36:19PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 7:47 PM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:07:06PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 1:55 AM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: This patch seems

Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-28 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:33:06PM -0800, Steve Fink wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:36:19PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 7:47 PM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:07:06PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 1:55 AM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote:

Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-28 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:39:36AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: Dammit, I had that working before I committed things. I'll fix. Looks like things drifted a bit since I wrote the patch. Want me to do it over? -- Michael G. Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl

Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-28 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:49 AM -0500 1/29/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:39:36AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: Dammit, I had that working before I committed things. I'll fix. Looks like things drifted a bit since I wrote the patch. Want me to do it over? If you can find where I messed up,

Re: *poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-28 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:33 PM -0800 1/28/02, Steve Fink wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:36:19PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 7:47 PM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:07:06PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 1:55 AM -0500 1/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: This patch seems

*poke* *poke* Parrot::Test - Test::Builder patch

2002-01-27 Thread Michael G Schwern
This patch seems to have slipped by in the post New Year's haze. It updates Parrot's version of Test::More to 0.41 and makes Parrot::Test use Test::Builder instead of doing Evil things to Test::More. Less Evil is Good. http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07760.html -- Michael G. Schwern [EMAIL