At 10:40 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote:
>At 09:09 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>At 1:03 AM -0500 3/30/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
>>>Frame stacks now keep their size, no use in freeing the chunks; if we
>>>reached a frame depth N once, we will typically reach N many more times.
>>
At 09:09 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>At 1:03 AM -0500 3/30/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
>>Frame stacks now keep their size, no use in freeing the chunks; if we
>>reached a frame depth N once, we will typically reach N many more times.
>
>If someone's feeling ambitious, code to check the nu
At 1:03 AM -0500 3/30/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
>Frame stacks now keep their size, no use in freeing the chunks; if we
>reached a frame depth N once, we will typically reach N many more times.
If someone's feeling ambitious, code to check the number of unused
chunks may be in order--that way if we
Frame stacks now keep their size, no use in freeing the chunks; if we
reached a frame depth N once, we will typically reach N many more times.
-Melvin
