Dan Sugalski wrote:
What're we looking at for performance impact on mops.pasm and the other
simple benchmarks?
I've now JITted mops.pasm (and other code) running with indirect
register access. It did slow down, but not because the additional
indirection (all inner loop code is still in register
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What're we looking at for performance impact on mops.pasm and the
> other simple benchmarks?
I didn't look yet. Compiling optimized takes ages here :) Anyway:
Estimate performance impact:
JIT mops.pasm 0 (i386, PPC)
CGP mops.pasm 0 - 1%
plain mo
At 3:33 PM +0200 10/22/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
A serious of patches has now eliminated all direct usage of Parrot
registers. The last patch also introduces a new define in
include/parrot/settings.h:
#define INDIRECT_REGS 0
It's default value is still off. But turning it to 1 will use the
ind
A serious of patches has now eliminated all direct usage of Parrot
registers. The last patch also introduces a new define in
include/parrot/settings.h:
#define INDIRECT_REGS 0
It's default value is still off. But turning it to 1 will use the
indirect access of Parrot registers through a pointer
