Josh Wilmes:
> Any chance of getting this in some time soon? The key.c part of it fixes
> the broken tcc (and probably lcc) builds. All tests passed with tcc for
> me, which is neat.
Most of key.c's about to die anyway, so I don't consider that particularly
important. OTOH, having non-broken
Any chance of getting this in some time soon? The key.c part of it fixes
the broken tcc (and probably lcc) builds. All tests passed with tcc for
me, which is neat.
--Josh
At 21:06 on 02/18/2002 GMT, Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> >
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> I think I'd rather we did have the cast in there. If nothing else,
> it'll help us note where we've cast incorrectly and, while that might
> just be an error in the casting, it might also indicate an error in
> the logic.
>
OK, this is a roundup of th
At 1:21 PM +0100 2/17/02, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>Steve Fink wrote:
>>
>> > - key->keys = (KEY_PAIR*)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
>> > + key->keys = (KEY_PAIR**)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
>>
>> That seems rather suspicious. I don't know anything about th
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
>
> Steve Fink wrote:
> >
> > > - key->keys = (KEY_PAIR*)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
> > > + key->keys = (KEY_PAIR**)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
> >
> > That seems rather suspicious. I don't know anything about
Steve Fink wrote:
>
> > - key->keys = (KEY_PAIR*)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
> > + key->keys = (KEY_PAIR**)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
>
> That seems rather suspicious. I don't know anything about the KEY_PAIR
> type, but allocating a chunk of memory big e
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
> > - key->keys = (KEY_PAIR*)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
> > + key->keys = (KEY_PAIR**)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
>
> That seems rather suspicious. I don't know anything about the KEY_PAIR
> type, but allocating a chunk
> - key->keys = (KEY_PAIR*)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
> + key->keys = (KEY_PAIR**)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
That seems rather suspicious. I don't know anything about the KEY_PAIR
type, but allocating a chunk of memory big enough to fit N structures
and the
Index: embed.c
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/embed.c,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 embed.c
--- embed.c 15 Feb 2002 02:30:02 - 1.10
+++ embed.c 16 Feb 2002 11:21:17 -
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
pf =
