[COMMIT] Re: [nick@unfortu.net: [PATCH] MANIFEST.SKIP]

2002-02-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 11:06:30AM +, Simon Glover wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Steve Fink wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:32:45PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > > > > > Should I add classes/array.c classes/array.h docs/embed.pod docs/io_ops.pod > > > to MANIFEST? > > > > *

Re: [nick@unfortu.net: [PATCH] MANIFEST.SKIP]

2002-02-01 Thread Simon Glover
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Steve Fink wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:32:45PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > > > Should I add classes/array.c classes/array.h docs/embed.pod docs/io_ops.pod > > to MANIFEST? > > *.pod, yes. classes/*.[ch], no. Autogenerated. > Erm, io_ops.pod is also autogen

Re: [nick@unfortu.net: [PATCH] MANIFEST.SKIP]

2002-01-30 Thread Steve Fink
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:20:28PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:55:54PM -0800, Steve Fink wrote: > > Ah. This suggests that this bit of the proposed MANIFEST.SKIP: > > ... > > becomes > > ^classes/.*\.[ch]$ > > Is it valid to assume that the only .h and .c files i

Re: [nick@unfortu.net: [PATCH] MANIFEST.SKIP]

2002-01-30 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:55:54PM -0800, Steve Fink wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:32:45PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > You can now do: > > > > nick@thinking-cap maniskip$ make manitest > > perl14405-32 -MExtUtils::Manifest=fullcheck -e fullcheck > > Not in MANIFEST: Configure.pl.rej >

Re: [nick@unfortu.net: [PATCH] MANIFEST.SKIP]

2002-01-30 Thread Steve Fink
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:32:45PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote: > You can now do: > > nick@thinking-cap maniskip$ make manitest > perl14405-32 -MExtUtils::Manifest=fullcheck -e fullcheck > Not in MANIFEST: Configure.pl.rej > Not in MANIFEST: MANIFEST.SKIP.orig > Not in MANIFEST: MANIFEST.SKIP~ >

Re: [nick@unfortu.net: [PATCH] MANIFEST.SKIP]

2002-01-30 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:13:11PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote: > Is a MANIFEST.SKIP a good idea, even if Configure.pl doesn't check it by > default? Revised patch. Any objections? [Either express objections or remove my commit privs else it goes in in 24 hours :-)] You can now do: nick@thinkin

[nick@unfortu.net: [PATCH] MANIFEST.SKIP]

2002-01-28 Thread Nicholas Clark
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] MANIFEST.SKIP From: Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch (context diffs mean that it's atop the Term::ReadLine p

[PATCH] MANIFEST.SKIP

2002-01-21 Thread Nicholas Clark
This patch (context diffs mean that it's atop the Term::ReadLine patch) adds a check for unexpected files not in the MANIFEST to Configure.pl I'm not certain that putting the test in Configure.pl is the right place for it, but I do believe that having an accurate MANIFEST.SKIP and the ability to