Re: [RfC] Semantics of fdopen.

2003-09-22 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:24:48PM +0200, Juergen Boemmels wrote: > > * Add an layer-argument to PIO_open and PIO_fdopen, which walk the > > layerstack and search for the Open-implementation. The current > > implentation of PIO_open with the default

Re: [RfC] Semantics of fdopen.

2003-09-21 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:24:48PM +0200, Juergen Boemmels wrote: > * Add an layer-argument to PIO_open and PIO_fdopen, which walk the > layerstack and search for the Open-implementation. The current > implentation of PIO_open with the default layer should be > renamed to PIO_open_default. W

[RfC] Semantics of fdopen.

2003-09-05 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Hi, The current implementation of fdopen op in PIO is buggy. The tests fail currently on every system except unix. This is because the test are based on the assumption of 1 being stdout on every system. Furhtermore the standard handles get autoclosed at exit. This has in the past lead to problems