Re: [TESTING] Question regarding directories...

2002-09-07 Thread Jeff
Sean O'Rourke wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Jeff wrote: --snip-- > What this code is trying to say is "don't run the parser tests, because > they're unmaintained". So probably something like > > grep !m{t/parser/} glob "t/*/*.t" > > would suck less. Maybe with a note about why it's

Re: [TESTING] Question regarding directories...

2002-09-07 Thread Sean O'Rourke
On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Jeff wrote: > In attempting to figure out why tests in languages/perl6 aren't running, > I came across something of an oddity in t/harness. > > > my @tests = @ARGV ? @ARGV : map { glob( "t/$_/*.t" ) } ( qw(compiler rx) ); > > Apparently designed to loop through just compiler/

[TESTING] Question regarding directories...

2002-09-07 Thread Jeff
In attempting to figure out why tests in languages/perl6 aren't running, I came across something of an oddity in t/harness. > my @tests = @ARGV ? @ARGV : map { glob( "t/$_/*.t" ) } ( qw(compiler rx) ); Apparently designed to loop through just compiler/ and rx/ directories, yet there are also bui