Re: [patch] changes to trace

2001-10-17 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 03:34 PM 10/17/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote: >If it looks reasonable, I'll commit it. Hmmm. Could we maybe abstract it out to a static interpreter function and call the function each time through, rather than embedding it in the loop? It'd give us a bit more flexibility and make things l

Re: [patch] changes to trace

2001-10-17 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
Brian -- > This patch makes trace a little more useful. It prints the constant > referred to, as well as the value of the register being accessed. > > ... > > If it looks reasonable, I'll commit it. I'd like to see this go in. Regards, -- Gregor ___

[patch] changes to trace

2001-10-17 Thread Brian Wheeler
This patch makes trace a little more useful. It prints the constant referred to, as well as the value of the register being accessed. This string reverse program trace 1 set S0,"Hello world" set S1,"" set S2,"" length I0,S0 dec