At 03:34 PM 10/17/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
>If it looks reasonable, I'll commit it.
Hmmm. Could we maybe abstract it out to a static interpreter function and
call the function each time through, rather than embedding it in the loop?
It'd give us a bit more flexibility and make things l
Brian --
> This patch makes trace a little more useful. It prints the constant
> referred to, as well as the value of the register being accessed.
>
> ...
>
> If it looks reasonable, I'll commit it.
I'd like to see this go in.
Regards,
-- Gregor
___
This patch makes trace a little more useful. It prints the constant
referred to, as well as the value of the register being accessed.
This string reverse program
trace 1
set S0,"Hello world"
set S1,""
set S2,""
length I0,S0
dec