Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Mike Lambert wrote:
>
>>Unfortunately, this causes different semantics for whether you are storing
>>primitives or pointers (primitives copy, whereas pointers are shallow). Of
>>course, one could argue that the previous one didn't work at all. :)
>>
>>T
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Mike Lambert wrote:
> Unfortunately, this causes different semantics for whether you are storing
> primitives or pointers (primitives copy, whereas pointers are shallow). Of
> course, one could argue that the previous one didn't work at all. :)
>
> Thoughts?
Well, it's certain
, whereas pointers are shallow). Of
course, one could argue that the previous one didn't work at all. :)
Thoughts?
Mike Lambert
Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 08:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Sean O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [
That's me. Will fix.
/s
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi
> # Please include the string: [perl #15942]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=15942 >
>
>
>
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi
# Please include the string: [perl #15942]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=15942 >
The subroutine.pmc and sub.pmc problems ([perl #15920]) are gone now
that Dan chec
