On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 09:21:47AM +, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Attached docu is for review and might also go in.
> Suggestions, bugfixes, comments welcome.
>
> leo
>
> PS sorry, no MANIFEST update, mine differs too much ...
Thanks applied. Plus MANIFEST
Corrections from myself and Brent Da
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 10:32:41AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote:
> Why not just drop the 'therefore'?
>
> Objects in all pools not alive are considered dead.
>
> Are the objects not alive or the pools? If it's the objects, is the "in
> all pools" necessary?
Yes, I'm just starting to wonder wh
Nicholas Clark:
# > +Objects in all pools not alive are considered dead therefore.
#
# I find the order of that sentence slightly confusing -
# therefore is quite an important word, yet it's the end (just
# like a perl5 regexp flag).
Beyond that, I believe it's bad grammar. I've never seen a
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 09:21:47AM +, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>Attached docu is for review and might also go in.
>>Suggestions, bugfixes, comments welcome.
>>
>
> I don't know enough about the technical specifics of parrot to find bugs
> in your descriptions. It's a
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 09:21:47AM +, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Attached docu is for review and might also go in.
> Suggestions, bugfixes, comments welcome.
I don't know enough about the technical specifics of parrot to find bugs
in your descriptions. It's a good document, thanks.
I did have
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #17766]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17766 >
Attached docu is for review and might also go in.
Suggestions, bugfixes, comments we
