On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:57:01AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
Can you try this?
(at the top of the function...)
va_list *arg = (va_list *) (obj-data);
(vararg accesses should look like...)
va_arg(*arg, ...);
(no
At 9:11 AM -0700 10/11/02, Steve Fink wrote:
Brent, what do you need to help work this out? Is there anyone out
there who could loan a PPC account to Brent, or perhaps be familiar
enough with stdarg to take a look directly? (Or how about some
grizzled grayhair who can tell us if this approach is
Andy Dougherty:
# On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
#
# Can you try this?
#
# (at the top of the function...)
# va_list *arg = (va_list *) (obj-data);
# (vararg accesses should look like...)
# va_arg(*arg, ...);
# (no end-of-function assignment should be
Brent Dax:
# Can someone with a PPC box try to figure out why this is happening?
#
# /op/string.# Failed test (t/op/string.t at line
# 1224)
# # got: '-1.13014e-302
# # -1.13014e-302
# # '
# # expected: '80.43
# # -1.1
# # '
Brent, what do you need to help work this out? Is there anyone out
there who could loan a PPC account to Brent, or perhaps be familiar
enough with stdarg to take a look directly? (Or how about some
grizzled grayhair who can tell us if this approach is doomed for
portability reasons? Not
At 12:25 PM -0700 10/11/02, Brent Dax wrote:
Argh. It looks like all the tests on PPC with the varargs core are
failing, but the test with the PMC core (t/op/string.t #96) isn't. I
don't get it--are they *trying* to make varargs impossible to use?!?
No, that's just a happy side-effect. :)
Andy Dougherty:
# You'll probably also want the enhanced sprintf tests (or
# something like
# them.) Currently, the only one that fails for me is the
# %5.3f test, which gives 0.500 in stdio, but
# 0.5 from Parrot.
I finally tracked down this bug. If you
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
Can you try this?
(at the top of the function...)
va_list *arg = (va_list *) (obj-data);
(vararg accesses should look like...)
va_arg(*arg, ...);
(no end-of-function assignment should be necessary)
If that works for
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Which reminds me, not sure if this is relevant yet, but there's some or other
platform that p5p encountered that can't simply copy whatever it is the opaque
type va_list expands to there.
There's a perl5 Configure symbol need_va_copy which
# New Ticket Created by Brent Dax
# Please include the string: [perl #17817]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17817
Inspiration struck me as I was working on bug fixes for Parrot_sprintf's
patch
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
[Brent continues to churn out amazing quantities of good stuff]
Overall, it continues to look very good. Unfortunately, the compact-looking
ch=va_arg((va_list)obj-data, char);
gave Sun's compiler indigestion. I had to split it up into the much
more
Andy Dougherty:
# Overall, it continues to look very good. Unfortunately, the
# compact-looking
#
# ch=va_arg((va_list)obj-data, char);
#
# gave Sun's compiler indigestion. I had to split it up into
# the much more pedestrian
#
# va_list arg;
# arg = (va_list) obj-data;
#
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
Andy Dougherty:
# Overall, it continues to look very good. Unfortunately, the
# compact-looking
#
# ch=va_arg((va_list)obj-data, char);
#
# gave Sun's compiler indigestion. I had to split it up into
# the much more pedestrian
#
#
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
# Unfortunately, the compact-looking
#
# ch=va_arg((va_list)obj-data, char);
#
# gave Sun's compiler indigestion.
Hmm. Just removing the (va_list) cast makes both Sun's compiler and
gcc happy. (That's because va_list is ultimately
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
diff -r -u parrot-orig/t/src/sprintf.t parrot-andy/t/src/sprintf.t
+ dval = 1.0e6;
+ S = Parrot_sprintf_c(interpreter, == %g\n, dval);
+ printf(%g %s, dval, string_to_cstring(interpreter, S));
Aargh. I forgot
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:42:36PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
diff -r -u parrot-orig/t/src/sprintf.t parrot-andy/t/src/sprintf.t
+ dval = 1.0e6;
+ S = Parrot_sprintf_c(interpreter, == %g\n, dval);
+ printf(%g
16 matches
Mail list logo
