subject:"\[perl #17844\] \[PATCH\] Avoid JIT on Sparc with 64\-bit INTVAL and 32\-bit pointers"

Re: [perl #17844] [PATCH] Avoid JIT on Sparc with 64-bit INTVAL and 32-bit pointers

2002-10-11 Thread Nicholas Clark

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 06:52:25PM +, Andy Dougherty wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty > # Please include the string: [perl #17844] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17844 > > > > The com

Re: [perl #17844] [PATCH] Avoid JIT on Sparc with 64-bit INTVAL and 32-bit pointers

2002-10-10 Thread Steve Fink

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 06:52:25PM +, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > The combination of 64-bit INTVAL and 32-bit pointers doesn't work with the > Sparc jit. Seems fair to me. Thanks, applied.

[perl #17844] [PATCH] Avoid JIT on Sparc with 64-bit INTVAL and 32-bit pointers

2002-10-10 Thread via RT

# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #17844] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17844 > The combination of 64-bit INTVAL and 32-bit pointers doesn't work with the Sparc jit.