Re: [perl #17903] [PATCH] sprintf test

2002-10-23 Thread Robert Spier
Steve Fink writes: I don't know exactly who has the permissions to do these things, but I'm pretty sure that if you have commit access then you also have RT futzing access. ^^^ this isn't true. The permissions are seperate (but obviously should be related.) -R

Re: [perl #17903] [PATCH] sprintf test

2002-10-22 Thread Steve Fink
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 02:51:24PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Steve Fink wrote: I don't know exactly who has the permissions to do these things, but I'm pretty sure that if you have commit access then you also have RT futzing access. I tried to set the status of my patches to

Re: [perl #17903] [PATCH] sprintf test

2002-10-17 Thread Steve Fink
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:19:45PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:09:54AM +, Simon Glover wrote: Here's a brief test for the PMC, PMC, PMC form of the sprintf op; as an added bonus, it also tests two of the formats not previously tested (%b and %o).

Re: [perl #17903] [PATCH] sprintf test

2002-10-16 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:09:54AM +, Simon Glover wrote: Here's a brief test for the PMC, PMC, PMC form of the sprintf op; as an added bonus, it also tests two of the formats not previously tested (%b and %o). Thanks, applied Nicholas Clark -- Even better than the real thing:

[perl #17903] [PATCH] sprintf test

2002-10-13 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover # Please include the string: [perl #17903] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17903 Here's a brief test for the PMC, PMC, PMC form of the sprintf op; as an added