Joshua~
On 10/9/05, Joshua Hoblitt via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 03 12:49:55 2005]:
> >
> > I brought it up on the list first, and Dan was OK with it because
> > scons can output a series of commands (like a bat file or batch
> > script) to build from scratch (n
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 12:29 -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> That sounds like a step backwards from autoconf/automake can provide.
> Granted, everybody agrees that make sucks but I don't see the point
> SCons. We'd be swapping a dependency on make for one on Python - with
> what advantage?
Python
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:49:25PM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> Joshua~
>
> On 10/3/05, Joshua Hoblitt via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Matt,
> >
> > There has been alot of discussion about build systems on #parrot
> > recently so I'm CCing p6i.
> >
> > Is SCons really an option for Parrot? I
Joshua~
On 10/3/05, Joshua Hoblitt via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Aug 22 17:19:34 2004]:
> >
> > All~
> >
> > This patch is an early step in getting a scons based build system for
> > parrot. Currently, it leaves the make system in place, the goal being
> > to add a
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Aug 22 17:19:34 2004]:
>
> All~
>
> This patch is an early step in getting a scons based build system for
> parrot. Currently, it leaves the make system in place, the goal being
> to add a SCons system alongside the make system until the scons one is
> entirely ready.
>
# New Ticket Created by Matt Fowles
# Please include the string: [perl #31285]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31285 >
All~
This patch is an early step in getting a scons based build system for
parrot. C
