Re: [perl #31860] [PATCH] Makefile cleanup

2004-10-08 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Will Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you please rediff resend. AFAIK is most of the stuff already done or changed under the hood - sorry. leo

Re: [perl #31860] [PATCH] Makefile cleanup

2004-10-06 Thread Jens Rieks
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 06:22, Will Coleda wrote: * side effect of this is that we now build parrotlib.imc into library/, not include/. which makes sense to me, though I could be addled. This required updates to: It is in include/, because I started to move all generated files to include/,

Re: [perl #31860] [PATCH] Makefile cleanup

2004-10-06 Thread William Coleda
From the standpoint of someone developing in PIR, this seems like an arbitrary distinction. I don't care how the file came to be. If it's an .imc, I'm probably going to want to include it. If it's a .pbc, I'm probably going to want to load_bytecode it. (Of course, this doesn't address the issue

Re: [perl #31860] [PATCH] Makefile cleanup

2004-10-06 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jens Rieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DWIM.imc is the last hand written file in include, I do not know what to do with it. It's used via the C.include directive, it's not a library. Being generated or not isn't really important, the usage makes the difference. jens leo

[perl #31860] [PATCH] Makefile cleanup

2004-10-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #31860] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31860 I tried to clear out some of dependency issues in Makefile, and got lost.