Re: [perl #39855] [CAGE] configuration: define MIN/MAX macros for all integral typedefs

2009-04-23 Thread NotFound
> It looks like those comments in platform_limits.h are out-of-place. > PARROT_INTVAL_MIN and PARROT_INTVAL_MAX are defined in > include/parrot/config.h, although the definition may not be as flexible > as the macros in perl.h that Nicholas mentioned.  It might be beneficial > to incorporate them i

Re: [perl #39855] [CAGE] configuration: define MIN/MAX macros for all integral typedefs

2009-04-18 Thread NotFound
>> It's great to have INTVAL and UINTVAL, but without MAX_INTVAL it's kind of >> hard to work with them in some respects.  All integral typedefs should > have >> min/max macros.  Syntax not a big deal, it can be fixed later, just don't >> break anything when introducing them. > > Nothing has happen

Re: [perl #39855] [CAGE] configuration: define MIN/MAX macros for all integral typedefs

2009-04-18 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:09:10AM -0700, Christoph Otto via RT wrote: > On Wed Aug 06 20:07:05 2008, Whiteknight wrote: > > On Sat May 17 14:57:18 2008, pmichaud wrote: > > > On Mon Jul 17 11:59:47 2006, chip wrote: > > > > It's great to have INTVAL and UINTVAL, but without MAX_INTVAL it's > > kin

[perl #39855] [CAGE] configuration: define MIN/MAX macros for all integral typedefs

2008-05-17 Thread Patrick R. Michaud via RT
On Mon Jul 17 11:59:47 2006, chip wrote: > It's great to have INTVAL and UINTVAL, but without MAX_INTVAL it's kind of > hard to work with them in some respects. All integral typedefs should have > min/max macros. Syntax not a big deal, it can be fixed later, just don't > break anything when intro