Re: [perl #41620] [PATCH] change opcode syntax for label arguments

2008-06-14 Thread chromatic
On Sunday 25 February 2007 20:12:58 Alek Storm wrote: > This patch changes the , , and INT> syntax in opcodes to , , and LABEL>, respectively. The argument is still an integer, however. > This cuts the number of argument directions down by three, and only > adds one argument type, making the co

[perl #41620] [PATCH] change opcode syntax for label arguments

2008-05-17 Thread Patrick R. Michaud via RT
On Sun Mar 16 09:24:16 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun Feb 25 20:12:58 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This patch changes the , , and > INT> syntax in opcodes to , , and > LABEL>, respectively. > > There's been no activity in this thread for > 1 year. While the patch > did apply succ

[perl #41620] [PATCH] change opcode syntax for label arguments

2008-03-16 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Sun Feb 25 20:12:58 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This patch changes the , , and INT> syntax in opcodes to , , and LABEL>, respectively. The argument is still an integer, however. > This cuts the number of argument directions down by three, and only > adds one argument type, making the cod

Re: [perl #41620] [PATCH] change opcode syntax for label arguments

2007-02-27 Thread James E Keenan
Alek Storm wrote: # New Ticket Created by "Alek Storm" # Please include the string: [perl #41620] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41620 > This patch changes the , , and syntax in opcodes to , , and , resp

[perl #41620] [PATCH] change opcode syntax for label arguments

2007-02-26 Thread Alek Storm
# New Ticket Created by "Alek Storm" # Please include the string: [perl #41620] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41620 > This patch changes the , , and syntax in opcodes to , , and , respectively. The argume