[perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-03-10 Thread James Keenan via RT
t/src/intlist.c has been passing on Darwin for me (PPC, OS X 10.4.11) since Feb 19, so I am closing the ticket. Merged #51000 into it, thereby resolving that ticket as well. kid51

Re: [perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-17 Thread Andy Lester
On Feb 16, 2008, at 10:29 PM, chromatic wrote: -chunk = list->first = chunk->next ? chunk->next : list->last; Urgh, I missed that list->first in the middle. My bad. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

[perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-16 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Sat Feb 16 20:23:16 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > After a whole day of binary searches, I've identified the problem as > occurring in a revision of src/list.c in revision 24840 (attached). > > I am currently testing to see whether simply reverting this change is > sufficient to get t/src/int

Re: [perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-16 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 16 February 2008 20:23:19 James Keenan via RT wrote: > After a whole day of binary searches, I've identified the problem as > occurring in a revision of src/list.c in revision 24840 (attached). > > I am currently testing to see whether simply reverting this change is > sufficient to ge

[perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-16 Thread James Keenan via RT
After a whole day of binary searches, I've identified the problem as occurring in a revision of src/list.c in revision 24840 (attached). I am currently testing to see whether simply reverting this change is sufficient to get t/src/intlist.t passing again on Darwin without breaking it on Linux (the

[perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-16 Thread James Keenan via RT
I got a pass at r24770 on Jan 12. So we're looking at something between 24771 and 24867.

[perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-16 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Sat Feb 16 16:34:33 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I got a pass at r24673 on Jan 08. So we're looking at something between > 24388 and 24867. Correction: We're looking between 24674 and 24867.

[perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-16 Thread James Keenan via RT
I got a pass at r24673 on Jan 08. So we're looking at something between 24388 and 24867.

[perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-16 Thread James Keenan via RT
I got a pass at r24387 on Jan 01. So we're looking at something between 24388 and 24867.

[perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-16 Thread James Keenan via RT
Failure began at or before r24867, Jan 15.

[perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-16 Thread James Keenan via RT
Failure began at or before r25454, Feb 03.

Re: [perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-16 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 16 February 2008 07:53:51 James Keenan wrote: > Back in November I filed a ticket (http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/ > Display.html?id=47531) which reported on failures in t/src/intlist.t > and t/src/io.t on Linux. There was discussion with chromatic and > Coke and, for whatever reason,

[perl #50922] [BUG] t/src/intlist.t failing on Darwin

2008-02-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #50922] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50922 > Back in November I filed a ticket (http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/ Display.html?id=47531