Additional testing note. If you try out this patch, you will need to
remove src/ops/*.c before doing a make. Otherwise ops2c won't be
re-run, and you won't actually be testing the patch.
Extra points for anyone who tests it on something other than gcc. :)
Mark
# New Ticket Created by Mark Glines
# Please include the string: [perl #52506]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52506
Sekana Fernando reported that src/ops/core_ops.c didn't compile under
g++. It
Following discussion on #parrot with Infinoid, I created the 'ops2c'
branch in our SVN repository to handle refactoring of this area of the
build system. You can follow developments there with:
svn co https://svn.perl.org/parrot/branches/ops2c
In that branch, I have applied Infinoid's patch
Following discussion on #parrot with Infinoid, I created the 'ops2c'
branch in our SVN repository to handle refactoring of this area of the
build system. You can follow developments there with:
svn co https://svn.perl.org/parrot/branches/ops2c
In that branch, I have applied Infinoid's patch
On Saturday 05 April 2008 20:29:45 Mark Glines wrote:
Sekana Fernando reported that src/ops/core_ops.c didn't compile under
g++. It reports an error about static op_lib_t core_op_lib being
declared twice, and rightly so, because it is. There's an initial stub
declaration, and another
On Sun Apr 06 07:39:09 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following discussion on #parrot with Infinoid, I created the 'ops2c'
branch in our SVN repository to handle refactoring of this area of the
build system. You can follow developments there with:
svn co
On Windows, make, make perl6, and make test all function in ops2c branch
with no more than the customary grumbling.
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.com
As per discussion on #parrot, the remaining TODO questions posed no
obstacle to merging the branch back into trunk. So I did so in r26830.
