[perl #56382] [RFC] Making Test::Harness 3 available without including it in core parrot.

2008-10-28 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT
On So. 07. Sep. 2008, 15:31:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This ticket has not been addressed since early July. Re-reading it now, > it seems to have two major discussion threads: one specific to > Test::Harness 3 and one relating more generally to the versions of CPAN > modules needed to configu

Re: [perl #56382] [RFC] Making Test::Harness 3 available without including it in core parrot.

2008-09-08 Thread Will Coleda
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:06 PM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Will Coleda via RT > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu Jun 26 11:01:00 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> chromatic wrote: >>> >>> > T::H 3 is only a requirement for people who want to type 'm

Re: [perl #56382] [RFC] Making Test::Harness 3 available without including it in core parrot.

2008-09-07 Thread jerry gay
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Will Coleda via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu Jun 26 11:01:00 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> chromatic wrote: >> >> > T::H 3 is only a requirement for people who want to type 'make >> smolder' (and >> > eventually I hope 'make smoke'), so probing for it w

[perl #56382] [RFC] Making Test::Harness 3 available without including it in core parrot.

2008-09-07 Thread James Keenan via RT
This ticket has not been addressed since early July. Re-reading it now, it seems to have two major discussion threads: one specific to Test::Harness 3 and one relating more generally to the versions of CPAN modules needed to configure, build and test Parrot. May I ask for those who have posted t

Re: [perl #56382] [RFC] Making Test::Harness 3 available without including it in core parrot.

2008-07-01 Thread Michael Peters
Will Coleda via RT wrote: > Based on recent emails to the list, apparently 'make test' in trunk > seems to now require T::H 3. (not just for 'make smolder'). > > If we can do without T::H 3 for simple 'make test', that would be nice. I don't think we need it for a simple make test. > If we need

[perl #56382] [RFC] Making Test::Harness 3 available without including it in core parrot.

2008-07-01 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Thu Jun 26 11:01:00 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > chromatic wrote: > > > T::H 3 is only a requirement for people who want to type 'make > smolder' (and > > eventually I hope 'make smoke'), so probing for it without bundling > it seems > > eminently sensible to me. > > Agreed. That's what we

Re: [perl #56382] [RFC] Making Test::Harness 3 available without including it in core parrot.

2008-06-26 Thread Michael Peters
chromatic wrote: > T::H 3 is only a requirement for people who want to type 'make smolder' (and > eventually I hope 'make smoke'), so probing for it without bundling it seems > eminently sensible to me. Agreed. That's what we do with TAP::Harness::Archive. -- Michael Peters Plus Three, LP

Re: [perl #56382] [RFC] Making Test::Harness 3 available without including it in core parrot.

2008-06-26 Thread chromatic
On Thursday 26 June 2008 07:37:46 Will Coleda wrote: > If we went this route, we could avoid including T:H3, and also remove > any of the remaining modules we bundle in lib/ > > Comments? T::H 3 is only a requirement for people who want to type 'make smolder' (and eventually I hope 'make smoke')

[perl #56382] [RFC] Making Test::Harness 3 available without including it in core parrot.

2008-06-26 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #56382] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56382 > I wanted to open a new ticket on this so discussion regarding how we get this in place fo