On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem appears to be that src/pmc/complex.pmc makes use of
> RE() and IM() macros that no longer work for subclasses of the Complex PMC
> and try to poke float values directly into the PMC struct. Unfortunately,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:47:57PM -0700, Mark Glines via RT wrote:
> On Tue Oct 07 08:14:04 2008, pmichaud wrote:
> > Just for the record, I went ahead and added a version of my
> > test script in this ticket to the test suite (t/pmc/complex.t).
> >
> > (The test still fails as of r31755, let me
Just for the record, I went ahead and added a version of my
test script in this ticket to the test suite (t/pmc/complex.t).
(The test still fails as of r31755, let me know if it should
be marked 'todo'.)
Thanks,
Pm
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 06:05:20AM -0700, NotFound via RT wrote:
> I've done some work in this problem. The attached patch is a way to make
> the examples work but I think this is not the way to go, or a lot of
> functions in a lot of pmc will need changes.
> [...]
I agree this really isn't the wa
I've done some work in this problem. The attached patch is a way to make
the examples work but I think this is not the way to go, or a lot of
functions in a lot of pmc will need changes.
Index: src/pmc/complex.pmc
===
--- src/pmc/comp
