On Tuesday 10 June 2008 09:54:02 Will Coleda wrote:
> >> Is this right? Do we need to copy and modify this everywhere we want
> >> to use ATTR? It seems like, if this wrangling is actually necessary,
> >> that we should be automatically constructing set_attr_str() with the
> >> pmc2c compiler.
> >
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:45 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 June 2008 07:50:41 Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> I tried to replace tcl's tclproc.pir (a subclass of Sub that added
>> attributes via PIR) with a pmc version.
>>
>> Here's my first attempt:
>>
>> pmclass TclProc
>>
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 07:50:41 Will Coleda wrote:
> I tried to replace tcl's tclproc.pir (a subclass of Sub that added
> attributes via PIR) with a pmc version.
>
> Here's my first attempt:
>
> pmclass TclProc
> dynpmc
> extends Sub
> group tcl_group
> hll Tcl
> maps
I tried to replace tcl's tclproc.pir (a subclass of Sub that added
attributes via PIR) with a pmc version.
Here's my first attempt:
pmclass TclProc
dynpmc
extends Sub
group tcl_group
hll Tcl
mapsSub
{
ATTR STRING *PIR_source; /* the PIR level source */