Dan Sugalski wrote:
Copying is the right thing to do here. If the compiler wants to put
copies of things into an aggregate, it can make copies first.
Ok, fine. I'll update comments WRT clone.
leo
At 10:35 PM +0100 10/21/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 04:54:48PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 9:27 PM +0100 10/21/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:18:37PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
>> I'm currently committing the new splice vtable method for arr
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 04:54:48PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 9:27 PM +0100 10/21/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:18:37PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >
> >> I'm currently committing the new splice vtable method for array classes.
> >> And finally, PMCs are currently
At 9:27 PM +0100 10/21/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:18:37PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
I'm currently committing the new splice vtable method for array classes.
And finally, PMCs are currently only copied in, not cloned - I don't
know, what is correct.
"clone" is a
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:18:37PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I'm currently committing the new splice vtable method for array classes.
> And finally, PMCs are currently only copied in, not cloned - I don't
> know, what is correct.
"clone" is a deep copy? whereas "copied" means that another
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Just in case folks missed it, I fixed the docs for the splice vtable
entries in PDD2.
Ah, thanks. I'll implement splice in the next days.
leo
Just in case folks missed it, I fixed the docs for the splice vtable
entries in PDD2.
--
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]